[Jeff Head]

This is about the third or fourth time the UK press has tried to throw this BS up against the wall on this particular raid.

Obviously it is not sticking.

Of course the Taliban people who were there returned fire ... how can you take fire and it not be ferocious? Any fire directed at you is ferocious ... so?

This is war, we're going to take casualities. The facts in the case are simple. Our special forces went into the heart of indian country on a raid to get information and ice some tangos. They came back with NO KIA's. That's a good outcome. End of story.

Semper Fi!

[Wright is right!]

Sounds as though the Guardian picked up Seymour Hirsch's now-debunked piece - and reworked it.

Michael

[cake_crumb]

"This is about the third or fourth time the UK press has tried to throw this BS up against the wall on this particular raid. "

My thought exactly. I read a different version of this a few days ago. Typical left-wing reporting: just keep re-writing the same BS over and over and keep feeding it to the sheeple. Eventually, they'll believe it.