Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ESCAPE AND EVASION (good ariticle on Delta Forces)
The New Yorker ^ | Issue of 2001-11-12 | SEYMOUR M. HERSH

Posted on 11/05/2001 6:48:15 AM PST by ARCADIA

What happened when the Special Forces landed in Afghanistan?

Early on the morning of Saturday, October 20th, more than a hundred Army Rangers parachuted into a Taliban-held airbase sixty miles southwest of Kandahar, in southern Afghanistan. A military cameraman videotaped the action with the aid of a night-vision lens, and his grainy, green-tinted footage of determined commandos and billowing parachutes dominated the television news that night. The same morning, a second Special Operations unit, made up largely of Rangers and a reinforced Delta Force squadron, struck at a complex outside Kandahar which included a house used by Mullah Omar, the Taliban leader.

In a Pentagon briefing later that day, General Richard B. Myers, of the Air Force, the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, reported that the Special Operations Forces "were able to deploy, maneuver, and operate inside Afghanistan without significant interference from Taliban forces." He stated that the soldiers did meet resistance at both sites, but overcame it. "I guess you could characterize it as light," he said. "For those experiencing it, of course, it was probably not light." He concluded, "The mission over all was successful. We accomplished our objectives."

Myers also told reporters that the commandos were "refitting and repositioning for potential future operations against terrorist targets" in Afghanistan. But at a second briefing, two days later, he refused to say whether commando operations would continue. "Some things are going to be visible, some invisible," he said.

Myers did not tell the press that, in the wake of a near-disaster during the assault on Mullah Omar's complex, the Pentagon was rethinking future Special Forces operations inside Afghanistan. Delta Force, which prides itself on stealth, had been counterattacked by the Taliban, and some of the Americans had had to fight their way to safety. Twelve Delta members were wounded, three of them seriously.

Delta Force has long complained about a lack of creativity in the Army leadership, but the unexpectedness and the ferocity of the Taliban response "scared the crap out of everyone," a senior military officer told me, and triggered a review of commando tactics and procedures at the United States Central Command, or CENTCOM, at MacDill Air Force Base, in Florida, the headquarters for the war in Afghanistan. "This is no war for Special Operations," one officer said—at least, not as orchestrated by CENTCOM and its commander, General Tommy R. Franks, of the Army, on October 20th.

There was also disdain among Delta Force soldiers, a number of senior officers told me, for what they saw as the staged nature of the other assault, on the airfield, which had produced such exciting television footage. "It was sexy stuff, and it looked good," one general said. But the operation was something less than the Pentagon suggested. The Rangers' parachute jump took place only after an Army Pathfinder team—a specialized unit that usually works behind enemy lines—had been inserted into the area and had confirmed that the airfield was clear of Taliban forces. "It was a television show," one informed source told me. "The Rangers were not the first in."

Some of the officials I spoke with argued that the parachute operation had value, even without enemy contact, in that it could provide "confidence building" for the young Rangers, many of whom had joined the Army out of high school and had yet to be exposed to combat. "The Rangers come in and the choppers come in and everybody feels good about themselves," a military man who served alongside the Special Forces said. Nonetheless, he asked, "Why would you film it? I'm a big fan of keeping things secret—and this was being driven by public opinion."

Delta Force, which is based at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, has a mystique that no other unit of the Army does. Its mere existence is classified, and, invariably, its activities are described to the public only after the fact. "Black Hawk Down," a book by Mark Bowden about the Special Forces disaster in Mogadishu, Somalia, in 1993, in which eighteen Rangers and Delta Force members were killed, took note of Delta's special status. "They operated strictly in secret," Bowden wrote. "You'd meet this guy hanging out at a bar around Bragg, deeply tanned, biceps rippling, neck wide as a fireplug, with a giant Casio watch and a plug of chaw under his lip, and he'd tell you he worked as a computer programmer for some army contract agency. They called each other by their nicknames and eschewed salutes and all the other traditional trappings of military life. Officers and noncoms in Delta treated each other as equals. Disdain for normal displays of army status was the unit's signature. They simply transcended rank." On combat missions, Bowden wrote, Delta Force soldiers disliked working with the younger, far less experienced Rangers.

Referring to the October 20th raid on the Mullah Omar complex, some Delta members told a colleague that it was a "total goat fuck"—military slang meaning that everything that could go wrong did go wrong. According to a report in the London Observer, the complex included little more than potholed roads, the brick house used by Mullah Omar, and a small protective garrison of thatched huts. The Pentagon had intelligence reports indicating that the Mullah sometimes spent the night there; a successful mission could result in his death or capture and might, at a minimum, produce valuable intelligence. Delta had hoped to do what it did best: work a small team of four to six men on the ground into the target area—the phrase for such reconnaissance is "snoop and poop"—and attack with no warning. (One senior intelligence officer said that a member of Delta Force had told him, "We take four guys, and if we lose them, that's what we get paid for.")

CENTCOM's attack plan called, instead, for an enormous assault on the Mullah's complex. The mission was initiated by sixteen AC-130 gunships, which poured thousands of rounds into the surrounding area but deliberately left the Mullah's house unscathed. The idea was that any Taliban intelligence materials would thus be left intact, or that, with a bit of luck, Omar would perhaps think he was safe and spend the night. A reinforced company of Rangers—roughly two hundred soldiers—was flown by helicopter into a nearby area, to serve as a blocking force in case Delta ran into heavy resistance. Chinook helicopters, the Army's largest, then flew to a staging area and disgorged the reinforced Delta squadron—about a hundred soldiers—and their six-by-six assault vehicles, with specially mounted machine guns. The Delta team stormed the complex, and found little of value: no Mullah and no significant documents.

"As they came out of the house, the shit hit the fan," one senior officer recounted. "It was like an ambush. The Taliban were firing light arms and either R.P.G.s"—rocket-propelled grenades—"or mortars." The chaos was terrifying. A high-ranking officer who has had access to debriefing reports told me that the Taliban forces were firing grenades, and that they seemed to have an unlimited supply. Delta Force, he added, found itself in "a tactical firefight, and the Taliban had the advantage." The team immediately began taking casualties, and evacuated. The soldiers broke into separate units—one or more groups of four to six men each and a main force that retreated to the waiting helicopters. According to established procedures, the smaller groups were to stay behind to provide fire cover. Army gunships then arrived on the scene and swept the compound with heavy fire.

The Delta team was forced to abandon one of its objectives—the insertion of an undercover team into the area—and the stay-behind soldiers fled to a previously determined rendezvous point, under a contingency plan known as an E. & E., for escape and evasion. One of the Chinook helicopters smashed its undercarriage while pulling away from the grenades and the crossfire, leaving behind a section of the landing gear. The Taliban later displayed this as a trophy, claiming, falsely, that a helicopter had been shot down. (According to the Pentagon, the helicopter had come "into contact with a barrier.")

The failed 1993 Special Forces attack in Mogadishu, with its enduring image of a slain American dragged through the city's streets, had created a furor, and led to allegations that the soldiers had been sent in without adequate combat support. The CENTCOM planners were unquestionably eager to avoid the same mistake, and their anxiety was perhaps heightened by the fact that the attacks would be the first of the ground war. But the resulting operation was criticized by many with experience in Special Operations as far too noisy ("It would wake the dead," one officer told me) and far too slow, giving the Taliban time to organize their resistance. One Delta Force soldier told a colleague that the planners "think we can perform fucking magic. We can't. Don't put us in an environment we weren't prepared for. Next time, we're going to lose a company."

In the briefings after the raids, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and General Myers gave no indication of the intensity of the resistance near Mullah Omar's house. Rumsfeld also chastised the Pentagon press corps for relying on unnamed military sources in filing the first reports on the raids before the commandos had returned. Rumsfeld said, "You can be certain that I will answer your questions directly when I can and that we'll do our best to give you as much information as we can safely provide." He added, "This is a very open society, and the press knows—you know—almost as much as exists and almost as soon as it exists. And the idea that there is some great iceberg out there that's not known, below water . . . it's just not true."

In the days that followed, as details of the raids filtered through the military system, the Pentagon gave no public hint of the bitter internal debate they had provoked. There was evidence, however, that something had gone wrong. On Sunday, October 21st, the day after the raids, the London Sunday Telegraph reported that the United States had requested the immediate assignment to Afghanistan of the entire regiment of Britain's élite commando units, the Special Air Service, or S.A.S. American officials told me that British military authorities assigned to CENTCOM were urging the Pentagon to forgo its airborne operations inside Afghanistan and, instead, bring the war to the Taliban by establishing a large firebase in Afghanistan. The British position, one officer explained, was "We should tell the Taliban, 'We're now part of your grid square' "—that is, in the Taliban's territory. " 'What are you going to do about it?' "

The after-action arguments over how best to wage a ground war continued last week, with many of the senior officers in Delta Force "still outraged," as one military man described it. The Pentagon could not tell the American people the details of what really happened at Kandahar, he added angrily, "because it doesn't want to appear that it doesn't know what it's doing." Another senior military officer told me, "This is the same M.O. that they've used for ten years." He dismissed CENTCOM's planning for the Afghanistan mission as "Special Ops 101," and said, "I don't know where the adult supervision for these operations is. Franks"— the CENTCOM commander—"is clueless." Of Delta Force the officer said, "These guys have had a case of the ass since Mogadishu. They want to do it right and they train hard. Don't put them on something stupid." He paused, and said, "We'll get there, but it's going to get ugly."

A senior official acknowledged that there were serious problems in the war effort thus far, but said, "It's like reading a six-hundred-page murder mystery. It's solved on the last few pages, but you have to read five hundred and ninety-eight pages to get there."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; deltaforce; oef; specialforces; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
I am not surprised the the Pentagon is clueless about what to do. In every war, they have to clear out the peacetime commanders. The guys usually don't do well in wartime.
1 posted on 11/05/2001 6:48:15 AM PST by ARCADIA (ebarrio630@aol.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
You are kidding right. Apparently you haven't read FR in the last couple days. This whole article has been clearly dismissed as a bunch of B.S.. Its author used up all his credibility years ago, and now appears to just make stuff up. Post the whole thing under fiction.
2 posted on 11/05/2001 6:51:41 AM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
Seymour Hersh is documented as not being accurate on this. (see the previous threads)

Hersh is wrong in light of the information timely previously released by the Pentagon.

For example, this 18 MEG mpg video of the incursion.

The actual incursion at night (18 Meg mpeg)

3 posted on 11/05/2001 7:01:05 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
This article has been politely said to be all lies. I don't think that General Meyers would lie about this, knowing that IF it were true and it came out, he would be hash. For now, I'm believing the General over a journalist that just wants a story.
4 posted on 11/05/2001 7:01:44 AM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
Delta Force has long complained about a lack of creativity in the Army leadership, but the unexpectedness and the ferocity of the Taliban response "scared the crap out of everyone," a senior military officer told me, and triggered a review of commando tactics and procedures at the United States Central Command,

When I first read these quotes on Drudge this was the line that convinced me the article must be wrong. Army forces may go in hoping to evade detection, but they don't get the crap scared out of them when the enemy turns up fighting. They expect that even when they hope it won't happen. If they thought the enemy only had rifles and the enemy turned up with tactical nukes that might scare the crap out of them. Everything else would be part of the mission.

Maybe I'm oversimplifying, but I just can't imagine elite military members having the crap scared out of them just because the enemy wants to fight them.

Shalom.

5 posted on 11/05/2001 7:16:24 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
We've been expecting the full text of the now-infamous Hersh article to appear. It's your parenthetical tag of "good ariticle [sic] on Delta Forces" that's creating heartburn here.

The official rebuttal: The Taliban were in disarray and inflicted no injuries on US forces. The injuries we did get were mainly from jumping and none were serious. There was no "escape and evasion," no withdrawal under pressure. We left when we were done.

6 posted on 11/05/2001 7:23:27 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
Actually I do believe some of this report. I also know that for some reason our soldiers are the best trained in the world but when compared to our own troops of WWII they are whimps. I also know that because of our sterile society and the overall lack of "MEN" in our armed forces these days that the Brits SAS are far superior to our Delta Force in fact so much so that the Brits have multiple wins against terrorism and yet Delta Force has scored a big fat 0. If the World War II generation were running the show the earth in Afghanistan would be scorched by now.
7 posted on 11/05/2001 7:25:42 AM PST by samuel_adams_us
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
How does one mount an ambush with SIXTEEN AC-130 GUNSHIPS circling? The answer is that one doesn't except of course in this reporter's imagination.
8 posted on 11/05/2001 7:30:26 AM PST by Nov3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
Agreed.
The Brits have the right idea.
9 posted on 11/05/2001 7:32:52 AM PST by silmaril
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samuel_adams_us
Thank you. Yep, the wwII generation didn't mess around. I read somewhere that getting the Taliban out of their caves with flame throwers is considered inhumane. Well, how did they get Japs out their caves?

To everyone else, sorry I didn't check to see if was already posted.

10 posted on 11/05/2001 7:38:02 AM PST by ARCADIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: samuel_adams_us
sam adams members since Oct 25, 2001.
11 posted on 11/05/2001 7:45:28 AM PST by beekeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
Good point, and here are some other red flags pointing out why this article is fiction.

1. "This is no war for Special Operations," one officer said

Nobody actually in the U.S. military would even think that, never mind say it. In any context.

2."The Rangers' parachute jump took place only after an Army Pathfinder team—a specialized unit that usually works behind enemy lines—had been inserted into the area and had confirmed that the airfield was clear of Taliban forces."

This is controversial?!?! Try standard operating procedure. We learned in WWII the importance of putting scouts on the ground before inserting a large number of troops by parachute.

3. "Why would you film it? I'm a big fan of keeping things secret—and this was being driven by public opinion."

Such a big fan of secrecy that he chooses to blab to some lying POS reporter. Crappy source.

4. "They operated strictly in secret," Bowden wrote. "You'd meet this guy hanging out at a bar around Bragg..."

Amazingly, all that secrecy is now in the past, as many members of Delta Force currently deployed in unknown locations are calling all their buds to fill them in on how screwed up their last mission was. Nice try Seymour.

5. "The mission was initiated by sixteen AC-130 gunships, which poured thousands of rounds into the surrounding area..."

Considering we only have 21 in the whole Air Force, and most of those remain in the U.S., I find it absolutely AMAZING we put 16 of them over a single compound. Not to mention that 16 AC-130's would lay down such a carpet of lead the guys on the ground would need a week with heavy equipment just to unbury the target compound.

6. "It was like an ambush. The Taliban were firing light arms and either R.P.G.s"—rocket-propelled grenades—"or mortars." The chaos was terrifying. "

Light arms and RPG's shot at night by non-NVG equipped Taliban against a "100 soldier" Delta Force "squadron", would be like a few mosquitoes on a moose. To imply that this was something men trained to the level of Delta Force commandoes couldn't handle is idiocy.

7. "Don't put us in an environment we weren't prepared for."

Apparently, the author would have us believe Delta Force isn't prepared to raid enemy compounds at night. THAT'S THEIR WHOLE F*#^$ING JOB.

8. "On Sunday, October 21st, the day after the raids, the London Sunday Telegraph reported that the United States had requested the immediate assignment to Afghanistan of the entire regiment of Britain's élite commando units, the Special Air Service..."

Gee, after-action reports weren't even in the system, and we already decided we needed to call the SAS to the rescue. Could it be, that just maybe, we'd already requested the SAS troops. Besides, I thought "military sources" had already determined that "this is no war for Special Forces."

Bottomline. The article smells worse than the Taliban, and is less truthful. This guy is nothing but a washed up loser, trying to make one last headline.

12 posted on 11/05/2001 7:51:33 AM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: beekeeper
sam adams members since Oct 25, 2001.

Knock that crap off!

13 posted on 11/05/2001 7:51:53 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
Checking to see if this had been previously posted is not the issue. Someone would have to have been living under a rock to have missed that this story has been completely discredited by Rumsfeld on down.
14 posted on 11/05/2001 7:55:08 AM PST by VA Voter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
Does anyone know when was the last time US forces 'jumped' into action?
15 posted on 11/05/2001 7:59:51 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
Thanks for the outstanding feedback. You seem to know a good deal more about the military than I do. I could only spot the obvious but it raised a big red flag.

Could you do me a favor and respond to my military question here?

Shalom.

16 posted on 11/05/2001 7:59:55 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: samuel_adams_us
I also know that because of our sterile society and the overall lack of "MEN" in our armed forces these days that the Brits SAS are far superior to our Delta Force in fact so much so that the Brits have multiple wins against terrorism and yet Delta Force has scored a big fat 0.

Your insight and manner of expressing it indicates to me that your probably 16 years old ... go back to studying for your drivers test.

17 posted on 11/05/2001 8:05:09 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
I read it twice. Where's the good stuff on Delta?
18 posted on 11/05/2001 8:05:25 AM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
If that's your idea of a "good ariticle," spare us.

Thanks for the break down of this, Rokke. Hersch is out to lunch.

19 posted on 11/05/2001 8:14:30 AM PST by Harp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
I think your evidence is good that Hersh may have made up this story or that he has a source (in a Congressional oversight committee) that's civilian and critical of the war on terrorism. But this is the sort of "fiction" that can and should be quashed immediately and decisively -- not debated in the media and FR. Myers's post-operation wording was, to say the least, semantic obfuscation. If he told the truth, he appeared to be lying -- or, at least, parsing the meaning of "is." This is a very important matter and deserves to be settled decisively. If Hersh is lying, as I believe, the lie can be exposed by the Secretary of Defense and the President demanding the names, ranks, serial numbers, and kind of medial treatment given to any Delta member during or after that operation. It's very unhealthy to allow Hersh and his supporters to argue that these are merely conflicting claims and Hersh's view is valid until proven wrong. Such an approach encourages the critical media to spread more disinformation in the guise of "sources."
20 posted on 11/05/2001 8:14:37 AM PST by Whilom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson