I thought that this was a good review.
1 posted on
10/07/2001 5:34:17 AM PDT by
vannrox
(MyEMail)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: vannrox
Not bad!
2 posted on
10/07/2001 5:38:26 AM PDT by
Glenn
To: vannrox
As reviews go I'd call that a keeper.
To: vannrox
I have read posts stereotyping of women and blacks a few times (which perhaps got through only because of the sheer volume of posts.) How can you possibly consider this article fair? The only real criticism of FR in it is tempered with a simple explanation which puts it in context! Obviously a right wing puff piece!
</sarcasm>
To: vannrox
Let's freep Flak Magazine! (just kidding)
6 posted on
10/07/2001 5:56:08 AM PDT by
waxhaw
To: vannrox
You can expect the usual Republican Party apparatchiks and Bushies, "Hey honey, they mentioned me in a magazine article and again on the internet. Kewl"
7 posted on
10/07/2001 5:56:43 AM PDT by
Gramps
To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Then there's TLBSHOW, king of the vanity posts; _Jim, much-hated government apologist; Michael Rivero, conspiracy hunter du jour; Inspector Harry Callahan, who believes the moon landings were faked and is FR's resident extreme right-wing wacko and Murraymom, FR's best-known and best-loved liberal gadfly. Heads up!
8 posted on
10/07/2001 5:56:49 AM PDT by
Ligeia
To: vannrox
Yep, he must've hung around a while to get this much accuracy in the review. Thanks for posting.
(One question though: will Registered's head be too swelled now to get through the door?)
9 posted on
10/07/2001 6:02:44 AM PDT by
Pharmboy
To: vannrox
Hmmm? I wonder if Barton Wong left out Hitlery on purpose?
Not a bad piece at all and very fair to boot. I especially like the paragraph about Dowd.
Thanks Barton Wong!
To: vannrox
Wow! Not bad - bump for our side
To: vannrox
It goes a long way to explain many aspects of Free Republic that have confused me in the short time I've been registered. Maybe this should be included in the Welcome Newcomers thread? Best regards,
To: vannrox
To: vannrox
That a forum like FreeRepublic can survive and thrive(at a time where most political pundits say that public views of political discourse in America today has reached an all-time high in cynicism and apathy)
is good news for all Americans. The audience-wisdom-participants seem small---miniscule!
To: vannrox
Nice review. Well done.
To: vannrox
Is this a re-print? Seems like I read it several months ago..... anyway - it is a good article and nice publicity for FR
To: vannrox TLBSHOW Registered Michael Rivero
Some people get all the press. Sheesh.
;^)
5.56mm
19 posted on
10/07/2001 6:20:08 AM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: vannrox
Pretty good.
Shows the diversity of opinion and beliefs.
More emphasis could have been made on the esprit de corps, in that, though we often disagree on tactics, we will muster our troops when called upon.
Hi...My name is Bubbafree and I'm a Freepaholic :^)
To: vannrox
Apparently you didn't see this the first time it was
posted in August?
To: vannrox; FreeFly
Excellent.
To: vannrox
I believe that this is a reasonably accurate description of Free Republic, for a change.
23 posted on
10/07/2001 6:29:39 AM PDT by
newslady
To: vannrox
A lively and controversial discussion of what direction Americans want their country to take is needed now more than ever, and agree with the Freepers or not, political Web forums can provide a great public service.
At the very moment that Bill Bradley was wailing about "the poor man's soapbox" being overwhelmed by "the rich man's wallet" FR and the others were rising to prominence. TV and radio ads are the venue of "the rich man's wallet"--but FreeRepublic enables any interested individual to read my insightful posts without charge. ("He that tooteth not his own horn getteth it not tooted.")
Why Broadcast Journalism is Unnecessary and Illegitimate.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson