That could be the case.
But the Marxists realized crashing a western capitalist economy to the point of revolution was nearly impossible. To create a revolution in the west meant the long march to institutional control which they characterized as the safety moat around the western economies.
Here we are a century plus later facing up against 90% of industry/institutional control by largely Marxists that very well may be crashing our economy.
Critical Theory dictates that all social interaction is governed by social construct. The key to dividing the west is to magnify the differences in the social constructs which is obviously pitting neighbor against neighbor mixed with the crashed economy and voila revolution in the west.
It all fits nicely together.
All that I can remember about Hegel’s Dialectic was that it could mean anything. LOL
The dialectic always requires a present enemy. And multiple enemies depending on what they apply it to.
Thesis vs Antithesis -> synthesis
The enemy is always the (horrible oppressive) antithesis to overturn and scream and rail against, and to do so incrementally via synthesis (little progresive steps) by reapplying the dialectic repeatedly.