But let's look at history - every nation has certain characteristics, and they don't just change.
China has never been able to project it's powers outside it's boarders.
When have they successfully been able invade another country? They couldn't even successfully invade puny Vietnam, after Vietnam had been at war for over ten years.
China has been invaded many times, but they've never been able to invade anywhere else.
Mongolia was a backwater's backwater, and they had one of the largest empire's in history. China had a glorious civilization, and they were lucky when they stopped outsiders from taking over.
What was their most successful military expedition? Korea vs. the U.S.?
While it is possible China could say, occupy Australia, I have my doubts as to whether they could pull it off. It would be unprecedented in their history. And they have plenty of their own demographic and cultural disasters coming.
Neither could the US until it also developed and expanded military.
China has entered a “new era,” Xi announced in 2017, and must “take center stage in the world.” Two years later, Xi used the idea of a “new Long March” to describe China’s worsening relationship with Washington...China cannot be a true global power if it remains surrounded by U.S. allies and security partners, military bases, and other outposts of a hostile superpower. One reason this scenario seems plausible to Americans is that it so closely resembles their own path to primacy. - https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/05/22/china-has-two-paths-to-global-domination-pub-81908
[China has never been able to project it’s powers outside it’s boarders.
When have they successfully been able invade another country? They couldn’t even successfully invade puny Vietnam, after Vietnam had been at war for over ten years.
China has been invaded many times, but they’ve never been able to invade anywhere else.
Mongolia was a backwater’s backwater, and they had one of the largest empire’s in history. China had a glorious civilization, and they were lucky when they stopped outsiders from taking over.]
China did not proceed further into Vietnam because Russian divisions stood ready to attack Northeastern China in support of its Vietnamese ally.
The Soviet Union, although it did not take direct military action, provided intelligence and equipment support for Vietnam.[80] A large airlift was established by the Soviet Union to move Vietnamese troops from Cambodia to Northern Vietnam. Moscow also provided a total of 400 tanks and armored personnel carriers (APCs), 500 mortar artillery and air defense artillery, 50 BM-21 rocket launchers, 400 portable surface-to-air missiles, 800 anti-tank missiles and 20 jet fighters. About 5,000 to 8,000 Soviet military advisers were present in Vietnam in 1979 to train Vietnamese soldiers.
During the Sino-Vietnamese War, the Soviet Union deployed troops at the Sino-Soviet border and Mongolian-Chinese border as an act of showing support to Vietnam, as well as tying up Chinese troops. However, the Soviets refused to take any direct action to defend their ally.[81]
The Soviet Pacific Fleet also deployed 15 ships to the Vietnamese coast to relay Chinese battlefield communications to Vietnamese forces.[82]]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_conquest_of_the_Song_dynasty
Mongol suzerainty over China lasted only a century. The truly humiliating thing about the end of Mongol rule is that it was terminated by a literal panhandler. This alms seeker went on to become the first Ming ruler.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hongwu_Emperor#Early_life
Note that thousands of miles away, at the literal end of their supply lines, small Mongol armies went through their far larger European counterparts like crap through a goose. It’s testament to the combat power of Chinese armies, fed by the copious resources of a major empire, that they withstood for decades the concentrated efforts of large Mongol armies that dwarfed the small detachments dispatched a continent away. Only the power struggle that followed the death of the Mongol khan of khans, and the atomistic tendencies of Mongol nobles and low-born war captains each seeking to carve out personal fiefs independent of central control prevented Europe from being overrun.