Throwing liberal media articles at me is not the way to convince anyone.
Notwithstanding, the case was about whether she acted with malice or not, not whether or not she said certain things, which she never denied. And a liberal judge unilaterally decreed she did. Thoughtcrime. And you’re upholding this violation of the First Amendment.
“Notwithstanding, the case was about whether she acted with malice or not, not whether or not she said certain things, which she never denied. And a liberal judge unilaterally decreed she did.”
I haven’t seen anything about such a declaration by a judge. Lake wanted the court to declare that she DIDN’T defame Richer, and therefore to throw his case out. The court ruled instead that the question had to be presented to a jury. That jury trial is the procedure that Lake has now short-circuited, by conceding liability.