Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chicago voters reject ‘mansion tax’ to fund homeless services during Illinois primary
ABC News | AP ^ | March 24, 2024

Posted on 03/24/2024 9:55:23 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

CHICAGO -- Chicago voters have rejected a one-time real estate tax on properties over $1 million to pay for services for homeless people.

It’s a loss for first-term Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who championed the so-called “mansion tax.”

The proposal would have incrementally raised the city’s real estate transfer tax on properties valued at more than $1 million. Supporters estimated it would have generated $100 million annually for homeless services, including for mental health care. There are roughly 68,000 homeless people in Chicago on any given night.

The measure also pitched lowering the transfer tax on properties under $1 million, which represents the vast majority of home sales in the nation’s third-largest city.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: bidenbordercrisis; chicago; election2024; homeless; illegals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2024 9:55:23 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Voters in cities including Los Angeles and Santa Fe, New Mexico, have approved similar measures.


so what happened to chicago?


2 posted on 03/24/2024 9:57:15 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I wonder what MJ would have had to pay on his mansion.


3 posted on 03/24/2024 9:58:02 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Wait until Chicago goes ahead and does it anyway, with the help of the courts to bypass the will of the people.


4 posted on 03/24/2024 9:59:18 AM PDT by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
- Chicago voters have rejected a one-time real estate tax on properties over $1 million to pay for services for homeless people.

Sure, because with Biden inflation most houses will soon be over a $1 million.

5 posted on 03/24/2024 9:59:54 AM PDT by tlozo ( Better to Die on Your Feet than Live on Your Knees )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Wait till they try this in CA.
A 800sqft shack costs +1M.
CA has run out of “other people money” and is now in serious trouble


6 posted on 03/24/2024 10:00:03 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“I see you have some money there. Give it to me.”


7 posted on 03/24/2024 10:04:33 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████s████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

a $1 million condo or home in Chicago is probably 75% of the homes inside the Loop and along North Shore / Lincoln Park

Its interesting to see Yuppie Democrats vote their own pocketbooks


8 posted on 03/24/2024 10:17:16 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Homeowners in Chicago pay outrageous annual real estate taxes (2nd or 3rd highest in the nation) and upon the sale of the home both buyer and seller pay transfer taxes of a combined $5.50 per $500 of value upon title transfer, (on a $300k sale, equates to $3,300) the highest in the nation. Theft by taxation continues unabated in the workers paradise of Chicago.


9 posted on 03/24/2024 10:20:09 AM PDT by john drake (Lucius Accius-Roman,170 BC - "oderint dum metuant" translated "Let them hate so long as they fear")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

“...so what happened to chicago?”

Rest assured they didn’t vote against it because it was the right thing to do..Chicago democrat voters NEVER do that. It was for some other less noble self-aggrandizing reason.


10 posted on 03/24/2024 10:21:01 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Boy. Talking about seeing a maxim come home to roost so comfortably, eh?


11 posted on 03/24/2024 10:22:00 AM PDT by rlmorel (In Today's Democrat America, The $5 Dollar Bill is the New $1 Dollar Bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: john drake

Homeowners in Chicago pay outrageous annual real estate taxes


Where were the non home owners, no votes there? couldn’t motivate their base?


12 posted on 03/24/2024 10:25:51 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Non-home owners (renters) pay the increased real estate taxes passed through by the landlord via rent. Rising taxes, especially outrageous ones, hurts everyone. Except maybe the politically connected, whose property taxes are often less than others in their neighborhood, or the homeless, which there’s 60,000 of them in Chicago, give or take.


13 posted on 03/24/2024 10:55:56 AM PDT by john drake (Lucius Accius-Roman,170 BC - "oderint dum metuant" translated "Let them hate so long as they fear")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

They did it in California but the threshold is higher, starting at 4% on $5+ million properties and 5.5% on $10+ property. This also includes apartment complexes, so it drives up rents. Our politicians are stuck on stupid.

It is up for repeal in November but Newom and the SoS are pulling out all the stops to get that off the ballot. The measure in November will repeal it, retroactively, and require any future special purpose taxes require 2/3 vote to pass.


14 posted on 03/24/2024 11:53:52 AM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Fair share program is snowballing until everyone is broke it’s the socialism program in action.


15 posted on 03/24/2024 12:02:32 PM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Prop 1 passed by the narrowest of margins in California recently with 50.2% yes and 49.8% no.

- and unfortunately - giving idiot Gavin Newsom 10 billion tax dollars that you can be sure will be squandered (just as billions have been squandered for the “high speed rail” - 16 years and billions of dollars and not one inch of track has been laid down....).

Give mass vote fraud in California, I assume the prop failed and fraud made up the difference.


16 posted on 03/24/2024 12:58:25 PM PDT by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: john drake

“Homeowners in Chicago pay outrageous annual real estate taxes (2nd or 3rd highest in the nation) and upon the sale of the home both buyer and seller pay transfer taxes of a combined $5.50 per $500 of value upon title transfer, (on a $300k sale, equates to $3,300) the highest in the nation. Theft by taxation continues unabated in the workers paradise of Chicago.”

You forgot to mention sales tax, gas tax, cable tax….also all among the highest in the country. Would not consider moving back to ILL under any circumstances.


17 posted on 03/24/2024 1:03:04 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie (When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

If Chicago voters would vote for Deep State’s agenda, why does Deep State have to steal their elections...?


18 posted on 03/24/2024 1:09:10 PM PDT by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I have a question- in the article it says “ voters have rejected a one-time real estate tax” and then it says “ Supporters estimated it would have generated $100 million annually“. If it’s a one-time tax, how could it generate 100 million annually ?
19 posted on 03/24/2024 1:33:44 PM PDT by telescope115 (I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: telescope115

I think the tax is assessed whenever a property is sold, not annually.


20 posted on 03/24/2024 1:53:01 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson