[rktman]

I knew it was kissringer before looking at the article.

[JonPreston]

That’s a fine Wall of Text. One of the better ones I’ve seen in a while.

[Fledermaus]

He has sex with women? Shocked.

Do they hold hands watching Alan Alda movies?

[Angelino97]

[BuchananBrigadeTrumpFan]

Money laundering is a great gig, especially for the select few who are allowed to operate in the open.

[Jane Long]

Most excellent Wall of Words!!

This gal, Mel, has done a LOT of legwork, tracking and posting all of this info, on these Congresscreeps.

Here’s another interesting post, of hers ...

Mel
@Villgecrazylady

The reason this is not investigated by anyone on the Right is because the Republican Party is doing the exact same thing. Don’t believe me? Test my theory:

Step 1: Go to http://FEC.gov

Step 2: Search and click on WINRED and then select 2021-2022 and click “browse receipts”

Step 3: under “select data type: receipt details” at the top of the screen put in
$.01 - $1.00 in the receipt amount boxes.

Step 4: order the receipts from lowest to highest.

Step 5: pick any one of the hundreds (thousands) of names that appear dozens of times in a row recorded as having given just 1 penny.

Step 6: paste that persons name into the FEC search and click “individual contributions” on the the left when the search returns.

Step 7: watch in amazement as records return showing that person is supposed to have given hundreds or thousands or even tens of thousands of times since 2019.

Something happened in 2018 for Democrats with ACTBLUE. I don’t know what it was, probably was some kind of AI system, but it enabled them to DOUBLE individual donations in the 2018 election cycle. Whatever it was, Republicans quickly caught up with their own programming sometime in 2019 when they launched WINRED.

George
@BehizyTweets
·
Sep 2, 2023

BREAKING: New investigation reveals Fani Willis was involved in a multi-state election fraud & money laundering enterprise

The investigators identified in the Fani Willis campaign finance report 222 contributions to her campaign that had ZERO donor information. Many of the…
Show more

10:20 AM · Sep 3, 2023
·
403.2K
Views

Mel
@Villgecrazylady
·
Sep 3, 2023

I’m not accusing candidates of being “in on it,” but its very clear that some candidates benefit from this scheme and some don’t. Before I show you an example a few things to know: *candidates* only need to show receipts for donors who have given more than $200 total ...

https://twitter.com/Villgecrazylady/status/1698355173788094572

[null and void]

tl;dr

[Moltke]

Are there no checks and balances on this sort of thing? Is it up to a private citizen to put the pieces together?

Impressive work, eye opening. Thanks for posting this.