Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rules that public officials can be sued for deleting comments, blocking critics on social media
Fox News ^ | 3/15/24 | Ass Press via Fox News

Posted on 03/16/2024 4:45:59 PM PDT by Libloather

A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Friday that public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media, an issue that first arose for the high court in a case involving then-President Donald Trump.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the court, said that officials who use personal accounts to make official statements may not be free to delete comments about those statements or block critics altogether.

On the other hand, Barrett wrote, "State officials have private lives and their own constitutional rights."

The court ruled in two cases involving lawsuits filed by people who were blocked after leaving critical comments on social media accounts belonging to school board members in Southern California and a city manager in Port Huron, Michigan, northeast of Detroit. They are similar to a case involving Trump and his decision to block critics from his personal account on Twitter, now known as X. The justices dismissed the case after Trump left office in January 2021.

The cases forced the court to deal with the competing free speech rights of public officials and their constituents, all in a rapidly evolving virtual world. They are among five social media cases on the court's docket this term.

Appeals courts in San Francisco and Cincinnati had reached conflicting decisions about when personal accounts become official, and the high court did not embrace either ruling, returning the cases to the appeals courts to apply the standard the justices laid out Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: comments; court; critics; freespeech; internet; socialmedia; sued
Is there somewhere I can leave Veggie Pedo Pete a few choice words? Let's go Veggie Pedo Pete.
1 posted on 03/16/2024 4:45:59 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

bttt


2 posted on 03/16/2024 4:56:16 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

A lot of FBI officials are going to jail, then (yeah, sure).


3 posted on 03/16/2024 5:01:40 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

But they can still lie their ass off !


4 posted on 03/16/2024 5:03:45 PM PDT by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

So this decision is limited to public officials who block comments on their own social media that they also use to make official statements. It is in no way related to social media companies pulling comments that they just don’t like. Nor does it relate to the government pushing social media to pull posts -suspend or block users.


5 posted on 03/16/2024 5:05:33 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Oh goody! Now I can sue Governor Creosote here in Illinois.

L


6 posted on 03/16/2024 5:09:15 PM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Ping


7 posted on 03/16/2024 5:30:45 PM PDT by scouter (As for me and my household... We will serve the LORD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Does this include the White House that keeps the comments turned off?


8 posted on 03/16/2024 6:08:05 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Hey Liz Cheney, are you reading this?


9 posted on 03/16/2024 6:32:16 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Makes sense. It’s like a town forum. AOC can’t tell her constituents to shut up.


10 posted on 03/16/2024 7:55:25 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

the decision itself:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-611_ap6c.pdf


11 posted on 03/16/2024 7:55:39 PM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Start suing, then. Donald Trump should be first in line, seeing as he’s lawyered up as it is, anyway.


12 posted on 03/17/2024 9:22:05 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the court, said that officials who use personal accounts to make official statements may not be free to delete comments about those statements or block critics altogether.

First, why would you want to use your personal account for official business? That just seems like a bad idea on the personal side. And second, why would government authorize official anything to be put out via an employee's personal account? Every government anything I've been involved in, they hate HATE letting you use personal anything in place of government-owned. Liability issues, authority, etc.
13 posted on 03/17/2024 11:41:26 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson