Posted on 03/08/2024 5:28:45 PM PST by george76
Biden, via proclamation, paused obligation of these funds the day he was inaugurated….” Court rules this was illegal, but I think Biden will find a way not to actually build the wall..
The timing of this is worth noting. Last night, in his vitriolic State of the Union address, Joe Biden blamed everyone but himself — but particularly Republicans — for his border crisis. But everyone knows, on day one of his presidency Biden by executive order removed numerous border protetions, including construction of a border wall.
...
Sen. Marsha Blackburn... on his first day in office, Biden:
— Paused deportations.
— Reinstated catch-and-release.
— Limited which illegals could be arrested.
— Halted construction of the border wall.
— Ended Trump’s successful ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy.
This is BIDEN’s border crisis.
...
A federal judge in Texas just ruled on the border wall halt, ruling the Biden illegally refused to spend and repurposed border wall construction funding already allocated by Congress. The suit was brought by Missouri and Texas, and their respective Attorney Generals announced the ruling tonight.
...
In 2020, Congress passed a law ordering @POTUS to finish President Trump’s border wall.
We just obtained a court order blocking him from illegally using your tax dollars on pet projects while the border remains open.
Biden must use the funds to finish the border wall
...
Attorney General Ken Paxton... Today, I secured a preliminary injunction against an attempt by the Biden Administration to illegally redirect statutorily obligated funds away from the construction of a border wall. Biden acted completely improperly by refusing to spend the money that Congress appropriated for border wall construction, and even attempting to redirect those funds. His actions demonstrate his desperation for open borders at any cost, but Texas has prevailed.
From the Court Order:
Walls and fences have existed at the border between the United States and Mexico for years. In 2016, however, former President Donald J. Trump made “building a wall” a key component of his presidential campaign. During his presidency, various efforts were made to either construct more walls or expand existing barriers along the border. This case focuses on two of Congress’s efforts in that regard.
In 2020 and 2021, Congress funded roughly $1.4 billion “for the construction of [a] barrier system along the southwest border.” President Jospeh R. Biden, Jr., who assumed office on January 20, 2021, had a different view of how these funds should be spent. President Biden, via proclamation, paused obligation of these funds the day he was inaugurated and ordered the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to reassess the situation. DHS issued two plans under this directive. Two now-consolidated lawsuits emerged from these actions: one by the Texas General Land Office (“GLO”) and another by the States of Missouri and Texas (the “State Plaintiffs”).
Now pending before the Court is the State Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, (7:21-CV-00420, Dkt. No. 19), which GLO has joined. The State Plaintiffs and GLO (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) move to enjoin the United States from implementing President Biden’s proclamation and to order DHS to obligate the funds that have been congressionally appropriated for the construction of a barrier system at the Southwest border. DHS argues in response that, notwithstanding the language in the statute, an injunction would be inappropriate because the challenged spending decisions are committed to its discretion. The Court disagrees. Whether the Executive Branch must adhere to federal laws is not, as a general matter, an area traditionally left to its discretion. And without that discretion, DHS’s spending decisions run afoul of the APA. After careful consideration, the Court GRANTS the Motion in part, (7:21-CV-00420, Dkt. No. 19).
...
The Court STAYS the effect of this Final Judgment for seven days from the date of entry to allow the Defendants to seek relief at the appellate level.
It’s unclear to me whether under this Order Biden actually has to construct the wall. It prevents him from spending the money on other things. And since open borders and mass illegal entry into the country is Biden’s overarching policy, I think he’ll find a way not to actually build the wall.
When my ex-husband was at Fort Benning, I used a public laundromat. A local fellow was folding his socks. He said the doctor advised him to wear only white socks, because of an allergy.
"It must be from the dyes," I responded.
"Naw, it was the from the colors," he said.
After I retired from corporate work, I got a job in a retail store to pass the time. I suggested to the manager that we could save time if all six work stations had a hand-held calculator, and that they were on sale at Staples that week.
"Should I pick up half a dozen calculators on my lunch break?" I asked.
"No, that's too many," she said.
"OK, how many should I get?" I asked.
"Six."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.