Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darksheare

But they do need a navy to protect critical infrastructure, and to launch missles, not to mention having any kind of deterrent to a near peer foe.

Every ship lost makes both less possible, as well as an embarrassment to the image they have projected for years

One of putins goals was to bring ussr er ah Russia back to the “we are important, and must be listened to” table

Every tank, aircraft, ship, air defense system lost degrades that, every drone or missile that gets through shows weakness .

Frankly don’t see many countries lining up to purchase weapons systems from Russia anytime soon even if they had systems to spare.
T-14 MIA,Su-57 mia t-90 destroyed in numbers, vaunted air defense systems destroyed by weapons they were supposed to be able to intercept.

Putin certainly has the resources to continue this for sometime, but at what cost for what benefit?


65 posted on 03/06/2024 4:53:10 AM PST by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: blitz128

USSR doesn’t exist and hasn’t existed since the 90’s
Democrats were upset that their beloved communist utopia was no more, and like a vengeful prom date, they have outright threatened war with Russia ever since.
Case in point: General Wesley Clark telling troops to fire on Russians at Pristina, Obama’s “red lines” in Syria, Hillary talking about war with Russia throughout the 2916 election cycle.


66 posted on 03/06/2024 4:58:28 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson