Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: combat_boots

Agree.

It was never to “overturn” but to look into ballot counting problems, do some recounts, examine and investigate discrepancies and to delay certification until serious allegations were looked into.


16 posted on 03/05/2024 11:06:16 AM PST by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: frank ballenger
It was never to “overturn” but to look into ballot counting problems, do some recounts, examine and investigate discrepancies and to delay certification until serious allegations were looked into.

1. The time to do that was BEFORE the electoral vote formalities were done in the states in mid-December 2020 (December 14th, I believe).

2. The inauguration date is established as January 20th. There was no way in hell any kind of investigation could have been done in two weeks. It was at least a year and a half before even a single jurisdiction completed its own audit of the 2020 voting.

25 posted on 03/05/2024 11:12:03 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson