To: Bobbyvotes
W is too close in density.
W 19.25 g/cm3
Au 19.3 g/cm3
15 posted on
03/02/2024 2:26:55 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: Paladin2
Still enough difference to be measured but I can understand your point.
17 posted on
03/02/2024 2:34:27 PM PST by
Bobbyvotes
(I will be voting for Trump/whoever in November. If he lgovernir oses, country is finished.)
To: Paladin2
Speed of sound is about 50% different. Tungsten 5220 m/s and gold 3240 m/s. Anyone who owns a lot of gold or buys and sells it better buy some ultrasound equipment.
20 posted on
03/02/2024 2:42:31 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Democrats' version of MAGA: Making America the Gulag Archipelago. Now with "Formal Deprogramming")
To: Paladin2; Bobbyvotes
Right you are, Paladin. The density of tungsten is very close to the density of gold. So a tungsten bar covered with a thin veneer of gold would pass the Archimedes test for gold.
As a side note, there was a Chinese company selling such tungsten bars as a “novelty item” a few years back.
I don’t know if they’re still in business. But the “novelty item” thing was just a cover. They were selling their bars so that the buyers could later commit fraud.
23 posted on
03/02/2024 2:46:25 PM PST by
Leaning Right
(The steal is real.)
To: Paladin2; Bobbyvotes
W is too close in density.I believe you are correct, testing equipment required is very high tech and very hard to use for absolute certainty.
Certainty would require destructive methods.
30 posted on
03/02/2024 4:27:37 PM PST by
Navy Patriot
(Celebrate Decivilization)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson