“But if she wins, you have to vote for her because we can’t afford to have a Democrat win.”
You are kidding right???? No, you don’t have to vote for her if she wins.. just because someone has an R beside their name doesn’t mean you have to support them! This is the sort of idiotic nonsense that needs to stop.
If someone is not fit, you don’t vote for them PERIOD, doesn’t matter if they are on your “side” or not.
You can’t drain the swamp, if your okay putting a swamp creature into the swamp, just because this one “is your kind”...
If you decide this person is unfit for office, or to represent you you don’ hold your nose and vote for them just because they have the right letter beside their name.. if you do, YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM.
Just don’t complain if the Democrats win in that case. Anybody who would prefer the enslavement of their children to avoid voting for impurity deserves to have their children enslaved.
You vote for it, you get it.
I understand what you are saying, that’s why you primary the candidate out, but vote for the candidate you won. I don’t have a problem with primarying Boebart out, but I do have a problem with allowing a Democrat to win because you couldn’t bear the idea of sullying your vote.
Someone who's personal life is a mess is not at all the same thing as a "swamp creature."
Swamp creatures are part of the corruption system in Washington DC.
At this point, I would vote for a whore if it meant not having someone who is *PART OF WASHINGTON DC*.
We are facing a crises of corruption and abuse of the law, and the primary qualification for office right now is *NOT BEING PART OF THE SWAMP*.
If they are good people, that's even better, but the main thing is that they be not part of the existing corruption system.