Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alexander_busek

Thanks for the explanation.

Of course, what is considered “successful” in the sexual arena is highly dependent on the person.

At the end of the day both men and women who are promiscuous are wanting from a moral standpoint.


61 posted on 02/18/2024 11:44:22 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Fury
Of course, what is considered “successful” in the sexual arena is highly dependent on the person.

What a "namby-pamby" response! "It depends upon what your definition of 'is' is," "There are exceptions to the rule," etc. - pure sophistry and avoidance.

My "key/lock" analogy stands. Anyone with an ounce of commonsense will agree.

At the end of the day both men and women who are promiscuous are wanting from a moral standpoint.

That is a purely moral judgement, and I took absolutely no stance in that regard. You are free to believe what you will in that respect; you will get no argument from me.

I was speaking merely about the fact that a man has to break his butt to get "action," while a woman doesn't. That fact has real-world implications!

And then there's the neurochemical aspect and the verified loss of a woman's ability to pair-bond. The consequences are probably more devastating to a woman's ability to find happiness in life than the other risks (which can, after all, be mitigated).

Regards,

64 posted on 02/19/2024 12:10:21 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson