[BobL]

I told the Republicans there not to vote for him because he wasn’t ‘pure’ enough for me, and therefore a Democrat, any Democrat is FAR BETTER, as that will ‘teach the GOP a lesson’.

(don’t laugh, half the people reading this agree with the above)

[AZJeep]

Yes, you are right. Half of the people here prefer “loosing with honor” that winning.
We, the Republican are in danger of becoming the PURE 25% party. Pure, but never winning anything!

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

I’m laughing anyway. And when Communism comes to America in the form of “teaching the GOP a lesson”, I will break out the old Soviet jokes.

[TornadoAlley3]

Lankford and Mullen haven’t helped themselves lately.

[rollo tomasi]

"teach the GOP a lesson’

Give me a break, it's more about the GOP is looking out for their own grift/interest just like democrats. GOP led people to be jaded towards their milquetoast Party, not the other way around.

Who wants to vote for people that act like a slang word for a female reproductive body part? Apparently people can't have convictions, must be lemmings like democrat voters, no thanks. People should vote for someone, not be subjected to play defense or "the lessor of two evils" quagmire/paradox.

BTW, the largest purveyors in the formation of the "Deep State" have been Repubs/GOP so riddle me that.