Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

G.O.P. Officials, Once Critical, Stand by Trump After NATO Comments
New York Times ^ | Feb. 12, 2024 | Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan

Posted on 02/12/2024 7:59:09 AM PST by conservative98

After Donald J. Trump suggested he had threatened to encourage Russia to attack “delinquent” NATO allies, the response among many Republican officials has struck three themes — expressions of support, gaze aversion or even cheerful indifference.

[cut]

In a phone interview on Sunday, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina seemed surprised to even be asked about Mr. Trump’s remark.

“Give me a break — I mean, it’s Trump,” Mr. Graham said. “All I can say is while Trump was president nobody invaded anybody. I think the point here is to, in his way, to get people to pay.”

[cut]

Senator Marco Rubio, the Republican Party’s top-ranking official on the Senate Intelligence Committee, struck a matter-of-fact tone as he explained on CNN on Sunday why he was not bothered in the least.

“He told the story about how he used leverage to get people to step up to the plate and become more active in NATO,” Mr. Rubio said on “State of the Union,” rationalizing and sanitizing Mr. Trump’s comments as just a more colorful version of what other U.S. presidents have done in urging NATO members to spend more on their own defense. “I have zero concern, because he’s been president before. I know exactly what he has done and will do with the NATO alliance. But there has to be an alliance. It’s not America’s defense with a bunch of small junior partners.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: 1worldgovernment; biden; globalism; globohomo; lindseygraham; maga; marcorubio; nato; obama; oldskoolwargamer2; peacethroughstrength; russia; standwithtrump; tomcotton; trump; trump2024; trumpwasright; ukraine; worldgovernment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Sacajaweau

“The message was...If you don’t pay your fair share...why the hell should we ‘subsidize you?’”

Exactly. Anybody can understand that ... if they choose to understand it. It’s simple and fair.


41 posted on 02/14/2024 3:16:15 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Fraud vitiates everything." - SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oldskoolwargamer2

“It’s disgraceful that he isn’t beating Biden by double digits.”

How do you know that? By results of polling that over-samples Democrats and hits people with push polls? LOL!!!


42 posted on 02/14/2024 3:18:36 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Fraud vitiates everything." - SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: oldskoolwargamer2

“Trump, not so much. Terminal diarrhea of the mouth.”

“Terminal”? Really? Absent major fraud in November, we’ll judge then how “terminal” it is.


43 posted on 02/14/2024 3:22:53 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Fraud vitiates everything." - SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson