Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alas Babylon!

Bombardier Challenger 600

I am sensitive to implications in media’s headlines. Calling this a “small plane” does not give any true indications of true size or capabilities of this jet aircraft.


7 posted on 02/10/2024 4:01:15 PM PST by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: oldplayer

“By then it was 63 ft (19 m) long, and 53.3 ft (16.2 m) wide, and capable of a maximum speed of Mach 0.85 and a range of 7,240 km (3,910 nmi). As an executive jet, it had sufficient capacity for 14 passengers.”

From Wikipedia. It can go about as fast as a standard passenger jet. I assume someone with money to burn chartered it for two passengers.


8 posted on 02/10/2024 4:17:44 PM PST by xxqqzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: oldplayer

Is it standard to try to land on a highway? A field would be a rougher surface. However, you wouldn’t be risking the lives of the people in the cars, and less chance of crashing into a cement barrier or whatever.

There will probably be youtube videos on this by pilotdebrief, etc.


13 posted on 02/10/2024 5:43:59 PM PST by xxqqzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: oldplayer

I found the description odd too. A 172 is “small”.


21 posted on 02/10/2024 7:30:12 PM PST by ARW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson