To: dynachrome
However, Friday's cross-examination saw prosecutors present text messages Jennifer sent to her attorney half an hour after she supposedly took the knockout-pills, raising questions over her testimony. Just as a matter of interest is anyone bothered by the fact that the prosecution has texts that were sent from a client to their lawyer?
Anybody?
10 posted on
02/02/2024 12:24:15 PM PST by
Harmless Teddy Bear
( In a quaint alleyway, they graciously signaled for a vehicle on the main road to lead the way. )
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Yep, I was wondering how they could introduce obvious privileged information to a jury.
24 posted on
02/02/2024 12:56:08 PM PST by
offduty
(Joe Biden, Commander in Thief)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
“Just as a matter of interest is anyone bothered by the fact that the prosecution has texts that were sent from a client to their lawyer?
Anybody?”
Yes does not seem right at all. Also what do sex parties have to do with this case of negligent homicide?
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
yes, I too am bothered the prosecutor has emails between a client and the defense.
32 posted on
02/02/2024 1:20:10 PM PST by
Ikeon
(Why is it acceptable to be a fool but, wrong to point it out? )
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
She took the stand, and testified about conversations with her attorney, so the judge determined that she’d opened the door. Privilege is a shield; she can’t use it as a sword.
45 posted on
02/02/2024 3:12:21 PM PST by
umbagi
(Patriotism is supporting your country all the time and your government when it deserves it. [Twain])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson