Posted on 01/31/2024 9:36:28 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
So you know what a real severed head looks like?
Main points...."After graduating in 2014 with a degree in agribusiness management, Mohn was “unable to secure a job commensurate with his education or sufficient to enable him to maintain his student loan payments.”
the judge, identified as Kearney J, noted they denied his third complaint after Mohn failed to pay the filing fees and “swore to having over $2,000 in his bank account and he only spent his money to buy marijuana for recreational and medical use.”
The judge responded to Mohn’s claims by saying they were “speculative and largely inaccurate” and chalked up his complaints to him being a “disappointed college graduate.”
In the footage, Mohn claims he is the commander of America’s network of militias as he rants against migrants, the Biden administration, the LBGTQ community, Black Lives Matter and “far-left woke mobs,” while calling for the slaughter and public execution of FBI agents, IRS employees, US Marshals, federal judges, border control officers and more “for betraying their country.”
1) Data points....Agribusiness....did Mohn want to get into the Hemp growing business? This my supposition given that he was....
2) "spending money to buy marijuana for recreational and medical use." (Was it spiked with something I wonder??)
3) It sounds like he was a habitual user suffering cannabis induced dissociative fugue to the point of violence. I wonder if his father confronted him about his drug use and joblessness and he snapped.
Probably drug induced psychosis that made him paranoid and violent. This may all be a false flag. Anybody know his party affiliation? His alphabet status?? That is what the thread should focus on, not the reporter's shiny "Q" object.
Sure. What's the bet?
My goodness - that's quite a compelling argument! There was a space!
(but not one in the "supporting materials" frequently posted in the same threads...but that's hardly relevant)
Another thread where the "leader" makes no separation of QAnon from Q - even says it is "the" thread in response to a question about where the "QAnon" posts are - doesn't say they are separate: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4168190/posts#4
Here's a post where you yourself wasn't even so confident: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4153536/replies?c=5
Nobody on this entire thread separates the two: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3894323/posts?q=1&;page=1
Just go back a couple of years, no one, even the most ardent Q / QAnon, etc. supporters, claimed there was "no QAnon". That's something new you call came up with recently - I guess because you have been completely and totally wrong over and over again for years you are trying to create a diversion.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3668122/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3743054/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3738577/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3709714/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3685630/posts
You can find hundreds more like it. Not a single person claiming "there is no QAnon" because the "Q" threads themselves said QAnon...oh, pardon me...Q Anon, with other supporting materials referencing "qanon" - and continued on the q threads for years to come.
All of this and much more takes mere minutes to find. Why argue it isn't true / ignorance? It clearly isn't. It's right there.
Considering that there is no such thing as “Qanon” outside of anything other than mediaidiots’ heads...
“Considering that there is no such thing as “Qanon” outside of anything other than mediaidiots’ heads...”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3624341/posts
One of hundreds of examples on this very forum to prove it!
“I never heard of QAnon before 2021”
You’ve been around here longer than that:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3624226/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3624341/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3624310/posts
Countless more examples than that going back years.
From right about the time 6 YEARS ago when the nomenclature got sorted out...
You at least demonstrate the capacity to be able to noodle out the history of what’s gone on perfectly well yourself so I’ll not waste my time attempting to bring you or any of the other douchebags types here up to speed.
Those threads appeared for years frequently and continue to be reference with ardent supporters.
Certainly isn't isolated to "6 years ago" as you claim and certainly isn't relevant to the argument there is not and never was people claiming there was a "QAnon." I'm sorry you think I'm of bad character / "douchebag" because I like dealing in factual information vs. falsities. You are certainly not the first and you won't be the last.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled QAnon believer accused of beheading federal worker dad smirks in new mugshot as it’s revealed he waged legal war with government over student loans, ETCM wrote:
q thread should have told you that.Q followers themselves coined the term.
False. The MSM coined the term. They wanted to use gov operatives to dilute the Q movement with crazy talk and they couldn't get 'cazy' or 'violent out of Q's posts.
Those who posted with Q on 4chan were called anons. There were no identity requirements to post on 4ch - anyone, including FBI disinformationists could post on that board and so they could inject anti-semeticism and suggestions of violence and falsely claim that garbage was ideologically the producta of Q. The MSM combined what Q was posting with EVERYTHING all the anonymous people (i.e. CIA, FBI operatives) posting on 4chan as Anons. That's why the MSM coined the label 'QAnon'.
Every Q follower on FR was referring to the movement as "QAnon or Q Anon". Graphics and memes posted on FR and the various outlets that featured Q content consistently featured the QAnon name. On twitter, Q followers used the #QAnon hashtag. It wasn't until late 2020 that the official FR thread evolved from Qanon to Q Anon to "Q-Trust in Trump's Plan" and the directive was issued "there is no QAnon". After 2-1/2 years of the term being the default name for the "group", that ship had sailed.
I referred to our threads as QAnon that way at first because I didn't see the MSM set up. I saw the MSM hated those who read Q content, and called them QAnon and 'dangerous'; I knew our threads on FR have been attacked ever since Q began posting, and so I assumed that QAnon was the most common term for Q content targeted by the MSM and trolls.Then on Oct 17, 2020, Q explained (Q4881) that 'QAnon' was an MSM fabrication to distort the Q movement's record by using operatives to portray themseves as QAnon, and seed reporting with violence, threats against the gov etc.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled QAnon believer accused of beheading federal worker dad smirks in new mugshot as it’s revealed he waged legal war with government over student loans, Responsibility2nd wrote: Q is a fraud and a con. Yeah. But how do you explain this average qtard?
I see you're carrying water for the treasonous MSM; you know, the ones trying to destroy President Trump.
No one in the Q movement had ever heard of that supposed "QAnon" guy with the buffalo horns strutting around in the Capitol on Jan 6 prior to the protest. Just like Jan 6 and Ray Eps at the MAGA protest, infiltrators like QAnon man are used by the MSM to tar patriots in the Q movement.
The MSM is beginning to call MAGA 'extremists' and Biden is beginning to call MAGA 'terrorists' the same way they man with the horns was called 'QAnon man'; he was a prop used by the MSM to distort the record of law abiding patriots.
Late October, I changed the title of our Q threads by dropping 'Anons' after Q explained the combo 'QAnon' was a fabrication the MSM was using against us.
Y'all aren't Prince or twitter.
We know. We've never said anything to suggest that Q is a status name. Once Q thread participants realized that QAnon was a label the MSM created for disinformation purposes, we abandoned it. We refer to Q threads without 'Anons' for the sake of accuracy. We just never had reason to wonder what you think about our decision.
You can say all you want "There is no QAnon" or "We are the group formerly known as QAnon" but no one is going to call you anything but QAnon. Except in your thread. .
False. President Trump acknowledges Q and Q+ as do those who study the content. Flynn and Trump Jr. have used slogans from the Q movement.
Y'all can call us whatever you like if you want to link arms with the MSM and promote their psyops.
Maybe you can come up with a symbol. Then people will get it
We don't need a symbol or any advice; we have posted 485 threads to date and have no intention of changing our thread title or image based on what you or anyone else calls us after 6 years of name calling, insults and heckling on FR and in the MSM. We might correct others for factual accuracy, but we don't curl up in defeat if y'all promote the MSM's smear campaign. We carry on, always.
Eloquent and cogent, as usual.
Sounds like a classic schizophrenic Give him a lobotomy STAT
_________________________
Aside from making one a zombie, do “targeted” lobotomys work? Wondering for a friend...
Meds work, if the Schiz would take them as prescribed. My friend is sober 20 years, and a schizophrenic. The voices he hears tell him that he doesn’t need the meds. I think that he needs stronger meds.
You just knew there'd be a phony-baloney talking point, but I'd expected him to be tarred as "right wing" or "white supremacist". Biden is on this guy's side regarding student loans, so no need to ask what party the killer is. Or this beheader guy's.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.