Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Ten bucks says it was Cheney
1 posted on 01/22/2024 6:31:19 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27
deleted more than 100 encrypted files from its probe just days before Republicans took over the majority

Pelosi and the Jan 6th Congressional panel participants are traitors to our country.

2 posted on 01/22/2024 6:34:53 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
"House Jan. 6 Committee gave aid and comfort to the domestic and foreign enemies of the United States as they deleted more than 100 encrypted files days before GOP took majority: sources."

There. Fixed it.

3 posted on 01/22/2024 6:36:31 AM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What are you trying to coverup nazipelouzy and upchuckyschlepter ????

TREASONOUS SCUMBAGS !!!!!!!


4 posted on 01/22/2024 6:36:40 AM PST by mabarker1 ( (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Isn’t destruction of government records a felony?.........................


5 posted on 01/22/2024 6:36:48 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
The panel is investigating the security failures on that day...

They weren't failures, it was intentional. I hate these mfers.

6 posted on 01/22/2024 6:37:48 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The House Administration Committee’s Oversight Subcommittee: “Did you delete material concerning Jan 6th that might have exonerated those who were led into the Capitol bui.ding?”

Liberals: “Of course we did... Whatcha gonna do about it?”

The House Administration Committee’s Oversight Subcommittee: “Oh, nothing, we were just curious is all”


7 posted on 01/22/2024 6:38:30 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The House has the absolute authority to punish it’s own members, Charge and Hold them for Contempt until the end of the Congressional Session.

“U.S. CODE
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
CHAPTER 6—CONGRESSIONAL AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE; INVESTIGATIONS
Sec. 193. Privilege of witnesses
No witness is privileged to refuse to testify to any fact, or to produce any paper, respecting which he shall be examined by either House of Congress, or by any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or by any committee of either House, upon the ground that his testimony to such fact or his production of such paper may tend to disgrace him or otherwise render him infamous.”

Simply look up Hinds Precedents, especially chapters 53 and 51, and Cannon’s Precedents, especially chapters 184-185. You’ll find numerous detailed cases of Congress asserting its power, arresting people, holding them until they agreed to answer questions, and then releasing them. Some of these people did not refuse to appear, but simply failed to satisfactorily answer questions.

Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)

If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.

Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.

Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.

Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.

Some references

[1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html

[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.” http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html

[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit

[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html

[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf

[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/

In 1857, a New York Times reporter refused to say which members of Congress had asked him to get them bribes (protecting his “sources” just as various Judith Millers today protect the people who feed them proven lies that costs thousands of lives), so Congress locked him up until he answered and then banned him from Congress.

In 1924 an oil executive appeared but refused to answer certain questions, so the Senate held — literally held — him in contempt. Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana argued that this question of contempt was of the gravest importance, and that it involved “the very life of the effective existence of the House of Representatives of the United States and of the Senate of the United States.” The matter was taken to court, and the witness fined and imprisoned.


8 posted on 01/22/2024 6:38:57 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Literal Definition of Obstruction.

Therefore, they are Obstructing an official Congressional investigation AND Process of Congress. They need to be ARRESTED and CHARGED with the above.

It’s a INSURRECTION.


9 posted on 01/22/2024 6:40:26 AM PST by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27; bitt; little jeremiah

isn’t destroying evidence illegal?

where was the J6 committee getting their advise? Hildabeast?


10 posted on 01/22/2024 6:41:09 AM PST by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Is any of it able to be recovered?


12 posted on 01/22/2024 6:45:27 AM PST by airborne (Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Isn’t this Russian disinformation? (sarcasm)


15 posted on 01/22/2024 6:47:40 AM PST by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Lock them all up.


18 posted on 01/22/2024 6:49:49 AM PST by Boomer (The Long Winter is coming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Pelosi is behind everything.


20 posted on 01/22/2024 6:53:31 AM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The “Committee” didn’t do it.
A person did it.
Find out who it was, and . . .

crickets


22 posted on 01/22/2024 6:57:34 AM PST by Macoozie (Roll MAGA, roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Hello...don’t tell me there’s no email server backups. I’m sure the FBI will be asking serious questions!!! lol...I won’t hold my breath.

I’m sure the R’s will be all over this!!! Oh...never mind.


24 posted on 01/22/2024 7:07:07 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Hello...don’t tell me there’s no email server backups. I’m sure the FBI will be asking serious questions!!! lol...I won’t hold my breath.

I’m sure the R’s will be all over this!!! Oh...never mind.


25 posted on 01/22/2024 7:07:07 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

IIRC they were told to NOT destroy any files by the new Hose of Representatives.


26 posted on 01/22/2024 7:13:17 AM PST by jdsteel (PA voters elected a stroke victim and a dead guy. Not a joke. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

or Thompson.


29 posted on 01/22/2024 7:15:20 AM PST by sauropod (The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

didn’t Nixon get in trouble for deleting some audio tapes


31 posted on 01/22/2024 7:20:07 AM PST by Sertorius (A hayseed with no Greek and dam^ proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Deleting the files was always in the cards....Ordered by Pelosi.


32 posted on 01/22/2024 7:20:25 AM PST by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson