I'm just wondering why this isn't more developed by now? It's a great way to use up nuclear fuel and the batteries are essentially reusable.
1 posted on
01/18/2024 1:07:17 PM PST by
Jonty30
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Jonty30
2 posted on
01/18/2024 1:09:59 PM PST by
sauropod
(The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.)
To: Jonty30
I'm just wondering why this isn't more developed by now? It's a great way to use up nuclear fuel and the batteries are essentially reusable.
3 posted on
01/18/2024 1:12:25 PM PST by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: Jonty30
Radiation pollution is my guess. It does make sense though as soon as they can make it 100% safe.
This a ship load of EV's on fire
4 posted on
01/18/2024 1:15:44 PM PST by
Boomer
(The Long Winter is coming...)
To: Jonty30
Yep, a Chinese-made nuclear battery. What could go wrong?
5 posted on
01/18/2024 1:16:54 PM PST by
hanamizu
( )
To: Jonty30
Orobably more like:
Be one of the first to take advantage of this sure-fire investment!
(But first follow this link for a detailed promotional video by world renowned Energy expert...
To: Jonty30
Well, first, it’s in it’s relative infancy, producing only 100 microwatts (0.1 milliwatt) which could power a watch. The one watt version could power much more. I don’t know about the problems with scaling it up in size.
7 posted on
01/18/2024 1:17:24 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
( "It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled."- Mark Twain)
To: Jonty30
magic battery technology is becoming quite avant-garde lately: this one has BOTH diamond AND nuclear technology!
10 posted on
01/18/2024 1:19:00 PM PST by
catnipman
(A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil)
To: Jonty30
“The BV100 can produce 100 microwatts at 3 volts”
Time to bring back the radium dial watch. /sarc
11 posted on
01/18/2024 1:19:29 PM PST by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
To: Jonty30
There have been other companies that have tried this tech...
They need air to work, so applications are still kinda limited.
A 50 year flashlight or cell phone is probably do-able though.
12 posted on
01/18/2024 1:24:08 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(A Psalm in napalm...)
To: Jonty30
14 posted on
01/18/2024 1:26:29 PM PST by
Fai Mao
(Starve the Beast and steal its food.)
To: Jonty30
And they only cost a million dollars apiece.
15 posted on
01/18/2024 1:30:18 PM PST by
Orosius
(Wake America Up Again )
To: Jonty30
The side-story to this is - The US Dept of Energy apparently owns the patent on this technology, and sold it to China for pennies on the dollar.
16 posted on
01/18/2024 1:30:45 PM PST by
PGR88
To: Jonty30
“... and can power a device for 50 years. “
Already been done. Voyager 1.
17 posted on
01/18/2024 1:35:34 PM PST by
Revel
To: Jonty30
…can power a device for 50 years - as long as it is a very small device, in a warm environment and is turned off the whole time.
19 posted on
01/18/2024 1:40:49 PM PST by
enumerated
(81 million votes my ass)
To: Jonty30
They’re programing the chip to allow them to have it go critical via backdoor software......
20 posted on
01/18/2024 1:46:39 PM PST by
G Larry
("XFKAT" We can't keep spelling out "X Formerly Known As Twitter"!)
To: Jonty30
Yes and if (and only) IF you properly fill out the registration form that comes with the Betavolt you get a lifetime guarantee that it will forever or until our company goes out of business.
21 posted on
01/18/2024 1:46:44 PM PST by
jmaroneps37
(Freedom is never free. It must be won rewon and jealously guarded.)
To: Jonty30
Because the actual amount of energy produced is miniscule. Yes, it can generate an electric current, but the usable wattage is tiny. And this idea is NOT new as of 2016. It has been around for a long time.
To: Jonty30
“”the first attempt, carbon-14””
But.... But.... Isn’t Carbon evil??
To: Jonty30
Uses radioactive isotopes.
What could possibly go wrong?
27 posted on
01/18/2024 2:11:34 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
To: Jonty30
AN IDEA-—NOT PROVEN-—COMPUTER DRAWN-—
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson