Posted on 01/17/2024 8:11:01 AM PST by Twotone
BTTT
IOW illegal.
condensed, republican appointed judges “constitution” and democrats “Orange man bad”
Was Smith trying to access Trump’s DMs or his Twitter posts? The story doesn’t really elaborate.
“A federal appeals court declined on Tuesday to reconsider its decision”... That’s all folks.
Dissenting opinions are interesting... But the decision is made and Trump lost.
“It worked, didn’t it?” - Harry Reid
It’s not a ‘break with precedent’. It’s an end run around the Constitution, the cheating bastard...........
Dissents don’t matter
And that means that the DoJ of the opposing party is free to do anything it wants to their opponents, according to the so-called judiciary.
Time to abolish the DC Circuit, and further restrict the use of so-called “special counsels” who are merely hired hit men for the party in power.
Still waiting to hear who Robert Peters’ contact list was.
Precedent. With any luck a Trump appointed Attorney General will be in charge next year. I’m sure there are mountains of evidence of illegal activity in this administration targeting Trump. I wonder what Biden knew and when he knew it. We may find out.
the headline focuses on the dissent, but the court as a whole ruled for the Demon Rat party.
not good.
We’re going to need a miracle for Trump to get in. The people in power don’t care what We The People want - they intend to not let their nest of vipers be disturbed any further. This is on X this morning from Simon Ameba - the African journalist who covers the WH (much to the displeasure of the Press Secretary):
I would like to tell you something uncomfortable, a bitter truth. Anything else is a lie. Do not be deceived by propagandists, demagogues, and politicians who just align with the wind. When
@NikkiHaley
said this is now a two-man race after losing Iowa, it was not about Trump.
She was referring to DeSantis and herself. This is because in the back of everyone’s mind here in DC, Trump is too dangerous to become President again and they won’t let that happen, at all costs! It is war!
Actually, the left, the deep state, and the DC establishment believe that Trump is an existential threat to the United States of America and his MAGA base has been brainwashed, and they have to take things into their own hands. They must stop him at all costs, and they will do it through the courts and eliminate him. If that does not work, they might go further, to the final option. I will refrain from mentioning it here.
This is not about trying to understand the MAGA base and asking why do they love him? Is he talking about their concerns? Is paying them the attention they need? Is he filling their needs? and any other question that you ask to win over an electorate.
@VivekGRamaswamy
spoke about it but he may change now after receiving backlash. He received a similar backlash after speaking honestly about the Israel-Palestine war, so he changed his position, and now condemns only money going to Ukraine, not to Israel, also a foreign nation. He also received a similar backlash after saying the 2020 elections were not rigged. He adjusted it by saying they were rigged by big techs and the deep state. Most MAGA people believe the elections were rigged at the ballot box. But all politicians are that way, they have to adapt to public opinion to fit in.
There are three wars that we are facing: the media war to win over independents, the legal war to disqualify Trump, and the deep state war to reportedly ‘save’ America from Trump. These wars will happen at the same time and the months ahead will be tumultuous.
Remember, no politician can speak the truth and survive. For thousands of years, the people who have spoken the truth have often been philosophers, poets, and thinkers, people who were not running for any office and did not need the approval of the public. This is because the public often rejects the truth when it contradicts their beliefs, for they prefer the comfort of illusions over the discomfort of reality.
That’s why Winston Churchill once said, “Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.” May God help us!
Image
Can’t this get appealed to SCOTUS?
Two-thirds down in the article: “It is not clear whether Trump plans to appeal this matter to the Supreme Court.”
Trump wouldn’t need to direct message on Twitter.
Dan Bongino thinks they are going after the metadata…in other words see who liked, reposted or commented on Trump’s post.
This information would be helpful for the government to compile an enemies list.
I think you are right.
Compiling a hit list of Trump supporters would seem a priority for them.
True...Reminds me of the Chinese eye specialist in Blade Runner “illegal!”
Given the way this was corruptly spirited through the Appeals Court it should be addressed by John Roberts, who oversees the Court, without Appeal addressed. Especially as this is Precedent setting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.