Posted on 01/09/2024 11:45:29 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Interesting info [there is much, much more] collected on Fauci:
“The Nuremberg Codes specifically prohibit experimenting on children who cannot be fully informed and give consent.”
FAUCI AUTHORIZED AIDS VAC EXPERIMENTS ON MENTALLY DISABLED KIDS & FOSTER KIDS
May 28, 2021
After some 23 German Nazi Medical Doctors were tried for crimes against humanity for the human experiments they carried out on unwilling prisoners of war and mentally disabled children, the Nuremberg Codes were created. The U.S. Government codified them into U.S. law.
What Are The Nuremberg Code’s Ethical Guidelines For Research?
The Nuremberg Code’s goal was to create universal standards to protect humans from enduring the cruelty and exploitation the prisoners endured in concentration camps. The
10 elements of the code are:
• Voluntary consent is essential
• The results of any experiment must be for the greater good of society
• Human experiments should be based on previous animal experimentation
• Experiments should be conducted by avoiding physical/mental suffering and injury
• No experiments should be conducted if it is believed to cause death/disability
• The risks should never exceed the benefits
• Adequate facilities should be used to protect subjects
• Experiments should be conducted only by qualified scientists
• Subjects should be able to end their participation at any time
• The scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment when injury, disability, or death is likely to occur
Fausi- Bio Terrorist
In a new National Geographic documentary glorifying Anthony Fauci, the controversial Biden regime medical advisor is shown complaining in 2020 about “These f**king dark web people” who “are really, really getting bad.”
10 years ago, in 2003, 04, 05, I was investigating this story. Children in an NYC orphanage (and the foster care system) used in clinical trials. The Associated Press took it national and found it going on in seven or more states.
“Some states declined to participate in medical experiments. Tennessee said its foster care rules generally prohibit enlisting children in such trials. California requires a judge’s order. And Wisconsin “has absolutely never allowed, nor would we even consider, any clinical experiments with the children in our foster care system,” spokeswoman Stephanie Marquis said.
Officials estimated that 5 percent to 10 percent of the 13,878 children enrolled in pediatric AIDS studies funded by NIH since the late 1980s were in foster care. More than two dozen Illinois foster children remain in studies today. “
No medical records were ever made available to official investigators.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyJLYPh9pxY
It Wasn’t Just Beagles and Monkeys – Fauci’s NIH Also Funded Medical Experiments on AIDS Orphans in NY City
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/wasnt-just-beagles-monkeys-faucis-nih-also-funded-medical-experiments-aids-orphans-ny-city/
VIDEO: ICC interview with Lizz Brown and Mimi Pascual https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyJLYPh9pxY&t=1471s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyJLYPh9pxY
***Download the collected PDFs: The ICC Investigation | Related-HIV-Testing-and-AIDS-Drug-Investigation Media-Coverage-and-Cover-up | Media Part 2
Flashback: Fauci’s NIH funded experiments on AIDS orphans in New York City
by WorldTribune Staff, October 26, 2021
Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institutes of Health (NIH) approved drug trial experiments on hundreds of AIDS orphans in New York City. Over 200 of the orphans died during or after the experiments, according to Liam Scheff, the investigative reporter who broke the story.
The Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC) “began testing drugs on its orphan population in 1992, the same year they became a subsidiary of Columbia University’s Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trial Unit, under Dr. Anne Gershon,” Scheff noted. “In 2003, I went undercover inside the facility and saw the effects of the drugs on the children myself.”
‘These children were, because of their HIV status, written off as a loss by the medical authority, before they even got a chance to live.’
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyJLYPh9pxY
Scheff broke the story in an article entitled The House that AIDS Built that first ran on Indymedia.org.
Scheff said his investigation found that the NIH and Columbia Presbyterian Hospital acted unethically.
The Associated Press reported in June 2005: “The government has concluded at least some AIDS drug experiments involving foster children violated federal rules designed to ensure vulnerable youths were protected from the risks of medical research.”
Fauci was the NIH AIDS Coordinator before being appointed as the first Director of the Office of AIDS research when the office was established in 1988. He served in that capacity until 1994. Fauci became director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in 1984 and still holds that position.
Scheff reported several deaths in children at the ICC during the drug trials, adding that “although the mainstream denied that any deaths were due to drug toxicity, they admit that over 200 children died.”
In 2005, the City of New York hired the VERA Institute to produce a final report on the drug trials. VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008.
VERA reported that 25 children died during the drug studies, that an additional 55 children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29 percent of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used).
No payment or compensation was ever paid to any of the children used in the trials, or to their families, Scheff noted.
Many of the drugs (like AZT and its analogues) that were used in the experiments on the AIDS orphans in New York City had previously been approved for use in adults and “evidenced life-threatening and fatal toxicities,” Scheff reported. “So why put a drug with severe recorded toxicities into a population of black and Hispanic orphans?”
Scheff noted: “Incarnation’s orphans live at the bottom of the American class system. Often the children of drug users, they were born into ill health and poverty. Additionally (and like all AIDS patients), these children were, because of their HIV status, written off as a loss by the medical authority, before they even got a chance to live.”
Why wasn’t Fauci’s NIH interested in competitive AIDS research?
“That’s the billion-dollar question,” Scheff noted. “That is, if inexpensive micronutrients and competitive disease and treatment models prove more successful than the current research, it will represent a loss of billions for the AIDS drug and research industry.”
https://www.worldtribune.com/flashback-faucis-nih-funded-experiments-on-aids-orphans-in-new-york-city/?fbclid=IwAR0NTsolgBwo8XDePTqcx9_5TP74cYcQ-4Rc7jOyCTFG1Rlf2U7CCl-ASkY
From “expert” who knew the answers to every possible question on COVID, to “I don’t recall” strange.
“From “expert” who knew the answers to every possible question on COVID, to “I don’t recall” strange.”
I find him totally disgusting.
He wishes!!
Ooooh!
Where have I heard THIS before!?
Bet being waterboarded with diesel fuel would make him “recall” real quick.../s
while being beaten by garden hose
I had always wondered why there was so little success in finding a good vaccine for AIDS. With the new Covid illness, big emphasis on finding a vaccine, and actually doing so. Of course, Big Pharma was bigly interested in finding one quick and getting all that government money (ours actually) for paid Covid shots. I believe that subsidy has gone away now.
Now I began to consider what in the AIDS situation would be the most profitable to Big Pharma? Covid seems to be acting a lot like Flu, and likely to require a shot every year for the new strains, just like flu. However as this new century progressed it became more apparent that drug combinations were showing better results in treating AIDS. So what do you suppose Fauci and his Big Pharma buddies finally decided. If you think, wow, we would do better if we just kept working on more drugs that can be taken every day for the rest of the AIDS patient’s. Then you are thinking like I did. I have no proof that anything like this happened, but it sure would make sense. An AIDS vaccine might turn out to only be needed at long intervals like tetanus, or mumps vaccines. So a little profit for AIDS vaccine or even very little, but if AIDS patients keep taking their 2 or 3 pills every day, and can live a reasonably long life, just think of the money to be made. I hope someone will investigate this idea, who knows what emails might be out there?
A word not typed at end of sentence 5 in paragraph 2, should read “every day for the rest of the patient’s LIFE.
I also should have pointed out that there is a far larger population vulnerable to Covid exposure and illness. AIDS sufferers are a much lower number. The more patients, the more potential money for Big Pharma.
I have no doubt at all that you hit the nail on the head.
It’s profit driven. There’s no concern for actually making people well, as healthy people don’t need medicine.
In thinking about it, it occurs to me that that is why they are hell bent on regulating supplements. It would be either to get in on that cash cow themselves, or keep people from using them and improving their health and not needing pharmaceuticals.
He took good lessons from the Clintons.....
It’s almost enough to make you wish they could just give them truth serum and force them to tell the truth.
But that is a can of worms that nobody should open.
They still have God to answer to and won’t be able to avoid answering Him or weaseling out of his judgment.
Just like Nixon’s henchmen during the Watergate hearings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.