Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking! Ed Meese’s amicus brief has been accepted in the Trump appeal (challenging Smith’s standing), and the court has directed the parties to be prepared to argue the issues raised by the Amicus Brief
Foia Fan on Twitter X ^ | January 2, 2024 | FoiaFan

Posted on 01/02/2024 5:42:44 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: NorthMountain

Yes.....he is 92 years old.


41 posted on 01/02/2024 9:48:03 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (Disband and Defund the putrid FBI. America does not need an out of control Gestapo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.40415/gov.uscourts.cadc.40415.1208584119.0_1.pdf


42 posted on 01/02/2024 10:00:28 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

P


43 posted on 01/02/2024 10:21:14 PM PST by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man; All

Devil’s Advocate for a moment:

If the claim is based on fraud because Trump knew there was no fraud in the vote, then his defense would be to introduce the evidence of fraud in the vote upon which he made is representations. Other cases (there are many) have dismissed the claims of fraud based on a lack of standing for the accuser. Trump has standing to assert it as part of his defense.

If the case is thrown out because Smith had no authority, then the evidence of the fraudulent election will never see the light of day through its introduction as evidence in Trump’s trial. The merits will never be reached.

The public will continue to deny fraud in the election.

Is Meese providing cover for the deep state to give them an out so that the real truth of the fraud will never be seen?

Just wondering.


44 posted on 01/02/2024 10:39:19 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

https://shipwreckedcrew.substack.com/p/is-the-supreme-court-derailing-us
and
https://shipwreckedcrew.substack.com/p/is-jack-smith-an-illegitimate-prosecutor


45 posted on 01/03/2024 3:48:43 AM PST by AJFavish (www.allanfavish.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
"[Jack Smith] has no more authority to represent the United States in this Court, or in the underlying prosecution, than Tom Brady, Warren Buffett, or Beyoncé."

That says it all!

46 posted on 01/03/2024 5:34:49 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (The power of the press is not in what it includes, rather, it's in that which is omitted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
Is Meese providing cover for the deep state to give them an out so that the real truth of the fraud will never be seen?

Not likely. Trump is trying to delay convictions in kangaroo courts before November.

47 posted on 01/03/2024 5:37:24 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

"Who the hell woke 92-year-old Ed Meese up?

Where was he and these Schaerr Jaffe co-filers when they were needed during Mueller?

The Amicus is (now proven) rock-solid, which makes their absence during TrumpI even more pernicious.

Schaerr Jaffe is a boutique white-shoe K Street firm that boasts former Trump OMB counsel Paoletta, and Eugene Volokh as an "academic affiliate" whatever that is lofl.

Oh but wait, Gene Schaerr signed off on this. Smart guy -- a former Scalia clerk and BushI Associate Counsel to the President.

So this is all about the Bushes preserving Poppy's vision of the Unitary Executive, not about helping Trump."


48 posted on 01/03/2024 5:41:57 AM PST by StAnDeliver (TrumpII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
"The public will continue to deny fraud in the election."

What "public"?


49 posted on 01/03/2024 5:55:17 AM PST by StAnDeliver (TrumpII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mouske

Regardless, even if The Bidet now appoints him, with Senate concurrence, everything he did while not an official is null and void IMO. That would really toss Jack the ripper into a box, perhaps one of criminal or civil behavior.


50 posted on 01/03/2024 6:27:00 AM PST by Mouton (US Home to one party rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Durham was already a US Attorney, Jackoff Smith was a Private Citizen and required Senate Approval to be appointed.


51 posted on 01/03/2024 6:33:40 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: roving
Supreme Court.

No, this one is the DC appeals court.

Meese ALSO filed an amicus about the same issue at the Supreme Court, but this order (that both sides present arguments January 9) is from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

52 posted on 01/03/2024 7:11:28 AM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
Yes.....he is 92 years old.

Yet light years ahead of Sleepy Joe in the brain power department.

Then again, my neighbor's dog is ahead of Joe.

53 posted on 01/03/2024 9:16:46 AM PST by COBOL2Java ("Life without liberty is like a body without spirit." - Kahlil Gibran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Good catch...I should have said the legacy media...


54 posted on 01/03/2024 9:39:40 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

>So then Biden will just appoint Smith (and then it’s legal).

He can’t. Congress has to. Just like Mueller.


55 posted on 01/03/2024 12:08:35 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson