Posted on 12/13/2023 8:16:17 AM PST by Pete Dovgan
If anyone on the right did this, the FBI would descend on them and their family in the middle of the night, with CNN in tow, and break down their front door and haul them out.
Why couldn’t Hunter say this stuff under oath in front of Congress?
behold the magic oxymoron bait and switch con job in your face spin...
” be deposed at the House Oversight Committee, but to hold a press conference and again offer to testify publicly”
being desposed
IS
publicly testifying.
I remember when an IRS agent, that targeted people based upon political orientation, was asked to testify. Then read a statement from her lawyer saying how everything was a lie, and then took the 5th....... Once she started, she couldn’t legally take the 5th. Nobody did anything.
Throwing in the phrase “not involved financially” makes it obvious that Joe was involved in his business otherwise. Such as by providing the access they were selling. Guilty.
Throwing in the phrase “not involved financially” makes it obvious that Joe was involved in his business otherwise. Such as by providing the access they were selling. Guilty.
No, they have already demonstrated that Joe Biden was getting payments from Hunter’s company. He was financially involved, and clearly they were willing to pay for something that allowed them to get millions without providing a physical product, like information.
When the J6 committee wanted DOJ to go after hundreds of Trump supporters, sure, no problem. When the GOP HOR subpoenaed Holder what happened?
https://nypost.com/2023/12/05/news/first-bro-james-biden-ducks-impeachment-deposition-for-now/
Biden’s brother James was subpoenaed for December 6. It’s all just noise. Congress goes home tomorrow.
100% to many crimes with communist countries not registered as a foreign agent ................
So it goes to “not involved” to “not financially involved.....”
§ 2635.702 Use of public office for private gain.
An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity, including nonprofit organizations of which the employee is an officer or member, and persons with whom the employee has or seeks employment or business relations. The specific prohibitions set forth in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section apply this general standard, but are not intended to be exclusive or to limit the application of this section.
(a) Inducement or coercion of benefits. An employee shall not use or permit the use of his Government position or title or any authority associated with his public office in a manner that is intended to coerce or induce another person, including a subordinate, to provide any benefit, financial or otherwise, to himself or to friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity.
There us only one solution left but nobody wants to “pull the trigger”!
When are SC voters going to pull their heads out of their butts?
Graham, Scott, Haley, Gowdy et al. LOSERS!
Laws don’t seem to apply to everyone anymore. How many protesters from the summer of riots got time? How many of them attacked federal property to destroy it? How about the murders and business destruction? Like the young lawyers in NY that burned a police car?
Laws have become tyranny to be imposed on only some of the population by a Government of the Government, by the Government, and for the Government. CIA, FBI, DOJ, Homeland, have become political apparatus for themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.