Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roving

I am coming to the reluctant conclusion that demographics reign Supreme here. Numbers on each side are what they are.
Short of huge influx of fighting g soldiers from outside Ukraine to help them, plus unlimited support in money and materiel to fight with, the Ukes do not have the resources to win against a determined Russia invasion in a protracted war of attrition.
Perhaps if the Ukes were re-armed with the nukes they had before giving them up in exchange for security garuntees after the Soviet Union dissolved, they could then threaten the Russians with a mutually assured destruction scenario.
I am not joking but don’t see it happening either.
Would be cheaper to give the Ukes their nukes back to threaten Putin’s Russia with than what we are doing now.
Change my mind?


75 posted on 12/06/2023 12:26:02 AM PST by desertsolitaire ( M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: desertsolitaire

“Would be cheaper to give the Ukes their nukes back..”

It would be cheapest to give the Russians their Ukrainians back......

In jest, but also serious.

If the Euro-peons want to fight for a Ukraine that can be economically exploited by the Europeans as opposed to being economically exploited by Russians........then let the Euro’s arm and do so.

US has MAJOR problems in SouthAm, Mexico, and the PacRim that are real threats to national security both military and economically.

The Ukes and Rusk are a diversion and Imperial profit/kickback center for the DC and Brussels SWAMP.

The Uke oligarchs are even more corrupt than the Rusk oligarchs.....and that is no mean feat.

Peace.


118 posted on 12/06/2023 7:42:08 AM PST by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson