I hate to be persistent, but it sounds like you were walking something back when, in post 73, you said: “My first comment was based on a recollection, as I said.”
And in your post 74 you say: “This is not my current claim. As I have explained 3 times.”
If you have walked nothing back, how does your previous claim (”The people in the district affective now have much higher taxes.”) now stand?
Freegards.