1 posted on
11/16/2023 6:59:06 AM PST by
george76
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: george76
I mean, she can learn it quick enough, but really?
2 posted on
11/16/2023 7:01:14 AM PST by
yldstrk
To: george76
She will be bad news for citizens of Oklahoma. She always rules in favor of the tribes in their on going power grabs.
To: george76
What law school did she attend, and did she ever pass the bar exam?
How did they think she’d be able to perform to the level required?
To: george76
I mean, she can learn it quick enough, but really?
5 posted on
11/16/2023 7:05:50 AM PST by
yldstrk
To: george76
Sara Hill is an excellent example of DEI. Her only qualification is her identity. Judicial competence is irrelevant.
To: george76
Another “Karen” in black robes pretending to be a man. We’ve got way too many of those already. That’s what I don’t like about “judges”. ANYBODY CAN BE ONE REGARDLESS OF THEIR INTELLIGENCE LEVEL. It takes more skill and knowledge to be a fast food fries guy than it takes to be a “judge”. In this country, all it takes to be a “judge” is proof of DemocRAT voter registration.
7 posted on
11/16/2023 7:07:56 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
('Build Back Better' is a Bidenskyyyyyyism for 'we gotta get rid of all dem white peoples'.)
To: george76
By current standards, she could qualify for the Supreme Court.
8 posted on
11/16/2023 7:08:24 AM PST by
UnwashedPeasant
(The pandemic we suffer from is not COVID. It is Marxist Democrat Leftism.)
To: george76
9 posted on
11/16/2023 7:08:50 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Never give up; surrender!)
To: george76
And, there’ll be plenty more just like her as law schools no longer require the LSAT and standards are lowered even further.
10 posted on
11/16/2023 7:09:31 AM PST by
Bon of Babble
(You Say You Want a Revolution?)
To: george76
How can she not know and elevate to this level? Equity. This is what DEI IS.
11 posted on
11/16/2023 7:10:35 AM PST by
Extra-Ordinary Objectives
(My preferred pronouns are intuitively obvious to the most casual observer.)
To: george76
But the idiots in the Senate will confirm anyway.
12 posted on
11/16/2023 7:11:31 AM PST by
Reno89519
(It's war. No one murders and takes Americans hostage. Time to act. Declare war on Islamic Hamas.)
To: george76
I graduated law school in 1980, did a two-year federal clerkship, private practice (litigation) for 12 years, then went into the state judicial system from which I retired last year.
Of course I know the diff between a stay and an injunction, because I was a litigator, but I had to look up "Dormant Commerce Clause" myself. There's an awful lot of law out there, and if you don't practice constitutional law specifically (a narrow and uncommon niche) this is kind of a trick question. Even Fed judges don't see that much Con law.
14 posted on
11/16/2023 7:12:50 AM PST by
AnAmericanMother
(Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
To: george76
She probably also can’t define a woman
15 posted on
11/16/2023 7:20:32 AM PST by
PGR88
To: george76
How can an individual who wants to be a federal judge possibly not know this? Affirmative Action.
16 posted on
11/16/2023 7:20:39 AM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(The Truth is like a lion. You don't need to defend it. Let it loose and it will defend itself.)
To: george76
Another “history-making” worthless “judge”. We’ve got a lot of those.
17 posted on
11/16/2023 7:21:17 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
('Build Back Better' is a Bidenskyyyyyyism for 'we gotta get rid of all dem white peoples'.)
To: george76
“What is the difference between a Stay and an Injunction?”
“How should I know, that’s what my clerks are for.”
Probably...
18 posted on
11/16/2023 7:24:33 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
To: george76
How can an individual who wants to be a federal judge possibly not know this?.
The democrats load the courts with stupid people for judges so they can get the case results they want.
Any Trump case is a prime example if it.
20 posted on
11/16/2023 7:25:22 AM PST by
Vaduz
(....)
To: george76; All
Thank you for referencing that article george76.
"John Kennedy Stumps Another Biden Judicial Nominee on Basic Legal Terms"
Regarding institutionally indoctrinated (imo) judicial nominee, and with all due respect to true statesman Sen. John Kennedy, how could the nation possibly have survived without the 17th Amendment, popular voting for federal senators by constitutionally low-information voters? /super-sarc
To: george76
Sounds like a perfect selection from President Retard
22 posted on
11/16/2023 7:28:18 AM PST by
NWFree
(Sigma male 🤪)
To: george76
24 posted on
11/16/2023 7:31:23 AM PST by
ChildOfThe60s
( If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson