Posted on 11/13/2023 9:18:56 AM PST by Nifty
Let’s be clear: News agencies may claim that these people were just doing their job. Documenting war crimes, unfortunately, may be part of it. But it’s not that simple.
It is now obvious that Hamas had planned its October 7 attack on Israel for a very long time: its scale, its brutal aims and its massive documentation have been prepared for months, if not years. Everything was taken into account — the deployments, the timing, as well as the use of bodycams and mobile phone videos for sharing the atrocities.
Is it conceivable to assume that “journalists” just happened to appear early in the morning at the border without prior coordination with the terrorists? Or were they part of the plan?
(Excerpt) Read more at honestreporting.com ...
obviously not the truth.
Nothing new. We have known from many wars and battles past the msm hunker down with our enemies or later stage photographic opportunities.
Reminds me of the low life “journalists” who filmed a man dousing himself with gasoline and setting himself on fire, instead of trying to help him.
You can only show atrocity pictures when supposedly done by Israel.
“Who does the media really work for?”
There is a reason I coined the phrase “Mediacrats.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.