Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON
"...According to police statistics, a total of 1,618 gun owners have registered 4,678 banned firearms..."

(Raises hand) So if they already have the information, what does registration even do for the state? Further, if they don't have the data on individuals owning these (ahem) 'assault weapons', then how could they prosecute?

10 posted on 10/20/2023 11:03:53 AM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: alancarp

My thoughts Also


11 posted on 10/20/2023 11:07:05 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (The Truman Show)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

My guess is that the intent of the law is to get as many idiots as possible to self register on an illegal gun registry before it is slapped down in court.

Law most likely will be slapped down, but once on a list they will NEVER come off. The list will never be destroyed.


13 posted on 10/20/2023 11:10:11 AM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp

Nah, those are just the ones who registered. Those are by no means the only “banned firearms” owners in the state. There must be hundreds of thousands more.


30 posted on 10/20/2023 11:47:40 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: alancarp
So if they already have the information, what does registration even do for the state?

Registering a banned firearm would self-indict the gun owner of admitting he has said banned firearm.

I think it's a trap.

32 posted on 10/20/2023 11:50:30 AM PDT by PROCON (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson