Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

The idea behind giving them weapons was that they would be defensive in nature.


5 posted on 10/17/2023 9:59:02 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

These targets are on Ukrainian territory.

In the meantime the Russians are free to bomb all Ukrainian territory. Go figure.


25 posted on 10/17/2023 10:42:58 AM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
The idea behind giving them weapons was that they would be defensive in nature.

It is pretty defensive to destroy millitary equipment which is being used against you.

If they were going after Russian civilian centers... it would be a different matter.

The whole war is being waged with kid gloves because Russia has a lot of nuclear weapons.

I would not be surprised to see Ukraine build their own nukes to balance Russia's nukes.

31 posted on 10/17/2023 11:02:48 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
The idea behind giving them weapons was that they would be defensive in nature.

Berdyansk and Luhansk are in Ukraine.

If the Russians would just keep their helicopters in Russia they'd quit getting blown up.

34 posted on 10/17/2023 11:08:27 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson