Golly gee, I guess Mitt's trying to get reelected.
Or, he's trying to help the Democrats dump Biden
Or both
To: cotton1706
2 posted on
09/12/2023 10:47:44 AM PDT by
Pearfect
To: cotton1706
He backs this probably because he doesn’t expect anything to actually change.
To: cotton1706
Linda Head fake.
At least he is not as stupid as Crazy Liz.
4 posted on
09/12/2023 10:51:15 AM PDT by
Zathras
To: cotton1706; All
“Not inappropriate”. You’re really out there on the edge Pierre. Maybe you need to walk it back a bit.
5 posted on
09/12/2023 10:54:08 AM PDT by
wiseprince
(Me)
To: cotton1706
Because he knows the Senate will never vote for it, so his approval is safe. Otherwise he would not vote for it. Smoke and mirrors.
6 posted on
09/12/2023 10:55:26 AM PDT by
lula
(Shine the light of truth Lord, confound the deceiver I pray...AMEN!)
To: cotton1706
Mittens is the Bud Light of politicians.
8 posted on
09/12/2023 10:56:40 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(The Democrats are wizards at two things: Finding votes and losing evidence.)
To: cotton1706
His handlers have given him the ok to go after Biden…
9 posted on
09/12/2023 10:56:49 AM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left )
To: cotton1706
10 posted on
09/12/2023 10:57:11 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: cotton1706
11 posted on
09/12/2023 10:57:44 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
To: cotton1706
He’s a weasel. He’d never vote to convict.
12 posted on
09/12/2023 11:00:17 AM PDT by
mass55th
(“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
To: cotton1706
We all know how Mutt we vote though, don’t we?
13 posted on
09/12/2023 11:02:42 AM PDT by
airborne
(Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
To: cotton1706
Knowing full well the Senate will never vote to remove him this is just a stunt by the virtue signalling prick.
14 posted on
09/12/2023 11:15:33 AM PDT by
bigbob
(Q)
To: cotton1706
15 posted on
09/12/2023 11:20:31 AM PDT by
No name given
(Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
To: cotton1706
16 posted on
09/12/2023 11:25:05 AM PDT by
sauropod
(I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.)
To: cotton1706
17 posted on
09/12/2023 11:29:20 AM PDT by
Night Hides Not
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
To: cotton1706
Yep. Were he not up for reelection he would not have any support for a Biden impeachment inquiry.
I am in agreement with the inquiry, and then with all the evidence at hand and made very public, decline to execute the actual imperachment proceeding, because there is no way its getting passed in the Senate, and it will hurt Biden no more than did the impeachment process against Clinton. That failure will be the Dims ticket for claiming it was all just a stunt - regardless of the truth and the evidence made public by the inquiry. The public listens to the media and the media is going to support Biden.
19 posted on
09/12/2023 11:32:05 AM PDT by
Wuli
To: cotton1706
My, my. Willard thinks we are so stupid as to believe that he's actually, not, not behind impeachment of Mister Biden.
There are insulting gratuitous gestures, and then there is this one.
23 posted on
09/12/2023 11:59:31 AM PDT by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never...in nothing, great or small...Winston ChurchIill)
To: cotton1706
But will he vote to convict?
24 posted on
09/12/2023 12:39:00 PM PDT by
vivenne
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
