While under normal circumstances I would agree, the conservative pundits including attorneys keep telling us the charges are weak at best & generally a nothing burger that easily should be dismissed or easily blown out of the water. With that being said, what defense is there to mount? This should be get it going and swat it down and move on. Or are these pundits and legal experts just bloviating to placate that part of the audience?
You mean psops?
Of course the Trump team is putting on a game face, why wouldn't they?
It's poker -- are you saying that nobody should ever bluff when playing poker? How does one inject a certain amount of doubt in the minds of the prosecutors without publicly declaring that their charges are false and are easily refuted, while still availing one's self of all the legal opportunities to slow down the prosecution and perhaps get them to make an unforced error? How do you get them to worry about which motions Trump is really worried about without throwing out a bluff here or there.
Why are you insisting that the Trump team play by the Marquess of Queensberry Rules and just roll over until the trial and not also play to public opinion?
-PJ