Posted on 09/06/2023 4:43:47 AM PDT by Morgana
A judge ruled on Tuesday that Georgia may resume enforcing its ban on hormone replacement therapy for transgender youth, putting the judge's previous order blocking the ban on hold.
The ruling comes after a federal appeals court granted neighboring Alabama the ability to enforce a similar restriction last month and as GOP-led states across the country seek to prohibit gender transition treatment for people under 18-years-old. At least 22 states have enacted laws restricting or banning transgender treatment for minors and most of these states have been sued.
Attorneys for the state of Georgia had asked Judge Sarah Geraghty to vacate the preliminary injunction after the ruling in Alabama's case, which came a day after Geraghty issued her initial ruling.
Geraghty did not go as far as to vacate her earlier decision but said that keeping her injunction in place was not possible after the ruling on Alabama's law by a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which includes Georgia. The judge instead issued a stay on her injunction ahead of a possible rehearing of the Alabama case before a larger panel of the court's judges.
The Georgia attorney general’s office spokesperson Kara Richardson said in a statement that the office applauds the ruling and "will continue fighting to protect the health and well-being of Georgia’s children."
Attorneys for the plaintiffs said they were disappointed "primarily for the families who are unable to get the care they need in Georgia or make medical decisions based on the best interest of their children." They also emphasized that their legal fight was not finished.
The ruling last month in Alabama's case said the state may impose a ban on puberty blockers and hormones for transgender minors.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
... until the DEMs find another judge to halt the ban once again.
“The judge instead issued a stay on her injunction...”
Maybe at some point she can issue an injunction on her stay of her previous injunction.
This whole sex obsessed jihad by the rats began with Scotus’ 1965 Griswold v. Connecticut ruling.
Roe is no more, but after almost 50 years of conditioning, far too many Americans regard abortion with as little concern as trimming a fingernail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.