Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

NARA refused to release records, saying admitting disclosure would reveal
(cough) “confidential advice” between then-VP Biden and Obama WH advisers.


Refusing to release publicly financed records?

Somebody better tell NARA that’s certainly true IF you live in Lower Slobbovia.

However, last time I looked, I observed we reside in
the USA where NARA’s actions are subject to public scrutiny.


7 posted on 08/31/2023 1:18:39 PM PDT by Liz (More tears are shed over answered prayers than over unanswered ones. St Teresa of Avila)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Liz

Hmm, yes, it was my understanding that “Executive Privilege” only protects certain of the President’s and Executive branch communications from the other 2 branches of the government, so, for example, Congress can’t subpoena them, and the courts can’t use them as evidence.

But the People are not a branch of the government. Executive Privilege should not keep those public records out of the reach of the public. You have to claim “national security” to do that.


24 posted on 08/31/2023 1:51:25 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

as seen with Trump, there is no confidentiality between lawyer and client if the client is committing a crime! Charge Pedo Joe AND his lawyers with crimes!!!!


41 posted on 08/31/2023 2:58:55 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson