In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Scott Ritter Sees Channel Banned on YouTube , Trabble5 wrote: Hunter, Joe, and Scott seem to be into diddling little kids for sure.
I always see that claim so I looked up Ritter. He wasn't 'diddling little kids' he was caught twice on chat rooms. His crimes were online chat rooms - I think he exposed himself in one instance. The chat room that happened - it was supposedly restricted to 18 and older, so he may actually have thought it was adults there. He did have child endangerment charge which I believe it was arranging to meet what would turn out to FBI but FBI says Ritter knew it was a minor. See, that's the problem - it may be the FBI knew ritter was promiscuous (adults) and used the chat room(s) to sting him. I now believe the FBI intently destroys anyone against the regime or in favor of Trump. Ritter says unpopular things about weapons so maybe the Deep State silenced him.
Mind you - I would not have him baby sit kids and wouldn't want to know him personally because I don't know if it was the FBI setup or not. But in the years since Trump took office, I read example after example of setups, frames, charges, the FBI arm twisting people into confessions. In the online swamp (DU) they brag that everyone Trump knows is a crook because look at all the litigation.
But hey, Ritter exposed himself on camera to an FBI agent, to what the FBI says Ritter believed was a minor, Ritter says he was in an 18 and older chat room. So there's sexually sleezy there, there's 'something' there, but not 'diddling little kids.' Hunter has been photographed naked with a child and Biden just incriminates himself around them. Different from Ritter.
It's sad when there's so much propaganda that Ritter became an important, rare resource in getting the truth about what's really going on in the Ukraine. I don't believe he should be banned/blocked for talking against the regime 'narrative'.