'Ted Talk' Given After Ketanji Brown Jackson's Disputed Claim About Black Babies in AA Case

RedState ^ | 6/30/23 | Sister Toldjah

[CaptainK]

This justice has staff attorneys and clerks at her beck and call, not to mention the other Justices themselves. Was no one at the Supreme Court able to explain her error to her in a manner she could understand?

The justices agreeing with her are her intellectual equals thus the mistake is their fact. Same thing for her AA staff.

For the other side to correct her, why step in a minefield?

[CFW]

“The justices agreeing with her are her intellectual equals thus the mistake is their fact. Same thing for her AA staff.

For the other side to correct her, why step in a minefield?”

---

Yes. I can imagine the allegations of “white supremacy-mansplaining” which would be ‘leaked’ from the Court to add to the recent pile-on of Justice Thomas (mattering not that Justice Thomas is actually black and only explaining the Constitution to someone who is unaware of its contents).

But, both Jackson and Sotomayor’s dissent’s were constitutionally weak and poorly written. Even many on the left are appalled at their poor dissents. What is a nation to do when their Presidents abuse their authority in such a manner and appoint activists to such positions

[IncPen]

Was no one at the Supreme Court able to explain her error to her in a manner she could understand?

If I were a conservative justice, I’d let her make the error. Why help the fool?

As troubling as this AA justice Jackson is, it’s equally troubling that her minions allowed the nonsense to go through—fomenting a lie because the cause is more important than the truth. That’s a very vivid sign of what we can expect here.

We better elect a good conservative president in the next few years—Clarence Thomas won’t live forever.

[Republican Wildcat]

“I’m not a mathematician.”

[Republican Wildcat]

Says a lot about her clerks - either they were incompetent and not providing good advice and counsel - or they were using her opinion to promote propaganda into the record. In either case, not a ringing endorsement for her qualifications for jurisprudence.

[CraigEsq]

Putting the best light on the claim, if you flip it around to the mortality rate instead of the survival rate, it is 0.04% vs. 0.09% - from that direction “double” is an arguable, but still highly misleading, position.