Nice try but yes, it will soon be shot down. He was not charged with “18 U.S.C. § 1924 - UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL AND RETENTION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS OR MATERIAL”, because that has already been decided by the Supreme Court and they decided the Presidential records Act overrides that.
They knew that case would fall flat on it’s face, so they went under the Espionage Act Title 18, United States Code, Section 793(e). Bear in mind, this statute requires willful knowing acts, careless, accidental, or negligence. Also it is not enough to show NDI existed. A jury may not find that information is NDI solely because it is classified. Instead, the government must prove the relationship of the NDI to national defense and, in some courts, the potential harm that could result from its disclosure.
Typical DC corrupt attempt, but Justice Thomas runs that judicial District. Soon, the Supremes will hand Jack Smith the resident of Holland another crushing defeat. And that doesn’t even get to other reversible actions like illegally designating his attorneys as co-conspirators to grab their notes despite attorney client privilege.
And then of course, straight up illegal acts like telling Nauta’s attorney that his Federal Judge application would not advance unless Nauta turned on Trump. That is straight up bribery.
But thanks for playing swamp boy. Don’t take it too hard when Thomas dashes your dreams. LOL
That should have read; Bear in mind, this statute requires willful knowing acts. Careless, accidental, or negligence is not enough under the law.
“ Nice try but yes, it will soon be shot down. He was not charged with “18 U.S.C. § 1924 - UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL AND RETENTION OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS OR MATERIAL”, because that has already been decided by the Supreme Court and they decided the Presidential records Act overrides that.”
What is the case to which you are referring ? I am not aware of any Supreme Court case addressing the PRA.