[Golden Eagle]

The president, decides what documents are presidential documents and what documents are personal documents.

Incorrect. It's clearly spelled out in the law what is Presidential, and what is Personal. And the scope of what is Personal is extremely limited. See post 74 for the exact text.

[AnthonySoprano]

[FreeReign]

The president, decides what documents are presidential documents and what documents are personal documents.

Incorrect. It's clearly spelled out in the law what is Presidential, and what is Personal. And the scope of what is Personal is extremely limited. See post 74 for the exact text.

No.

For starters, the PRA is NOT a criminal statute. It's a civil statute. Trump's actions which are covered under this statute are NOT indictable. The raid was bogus. The indictment is bogus.

About Trump's actions and the PRA civil statute, the PRA says that the designation of records as "personal" versus "presidential" is a decision made by the president during the president's term of office.

This issue was already litigated, in CIVIL COURT, by Judge Amy Jackson, in the Clinton Socks Draw Case. She ruled:

"The PRA contains no provision obligating or even permitting the Archivist to assume control over records that the President “categorized” and “filed separately” as personal records. At the conclusion of the President's term, the Archivist only “assume[s] responsibility for ... the Presidential records.”

Civil Action No. 10–1834 (ABJ) | 2012-03-1 | JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

And it makes sense too, because Article II Section 1 of the Constitution says that all executive branch power is vested in the president.

As I correctly said the first time, the president, decides what documents are presidential documents and what documents are personal documents.