It proves they were doing something they weren’t supposed to. But then she has to prove the nature of the tampering, and that the tampered machines were taken to Republican-voting districts.
How do you know it proves they were doing something not allowed? They could have been checking the settings, cleaning, verifying info....the defense can create all kinds of doubt. It’s the same as Ruby whats her name pulling the suitcases of ballots from under the table after everyone left...clear as day on video, no way to prove those were illegal ballots in the case.
No. The tampering alone is enough to invalidate the original inspection.
If you buy a toothbrush from Walmart, but the package has been opened... would you still use it?