Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former sports editor sues Gannett, D&C for(reverse) racial discrimination
Fingerlakes1.com ^ | May 1, 2023 5:56 AM | Staff Report

Posted on 05/01/2023 3:31:15 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

Steven Bradley, ex-sports editor for the Democrat and Chronicle, has filed a discrimination lawsuit against the newspaper, its parent company Gannett Co. Inc., and another Gannett-owned publication, the Utica Observer-Dispatch. Bradley, a white male, alleges racial discrimination following his termination from the Democrat and Chronicle and subsequent rejection for a position at the Observer-Dispatch.

The lawsuit, filed in Monroe County’s state Supreme Court on Friday, seeks class action status with Bradley as the named plaintiff. The suit accuses the defendants of discriminating against non-minority employees based on their race.

Bradley lives in Wayne County and is represented by the Thomas & Solomon LLP law firm. According to the complaint, Bradley had a distinguished career at the Democrat & Chronicle from 1999 to 2020, receiving numerous awards and recognitions.

The lawsuit claims that around 2020, Gannett implemented a policy to achieve inclusion quotas, committing to match employment demographics with the racial and ethnic demographics of the communities their newsrooms cover by 2025. Gannett managers were offered bonuses and promotions to staff newsrooms with employees of racial and ethnic backgrounds at rates comparable to local racial demographics. The suit alleges that this policy led to the termination of several highly qualified non-minority employees based on their race.

The lawsuit further claims that Bradley’s termination was a direct result of Gannett’s reverse race discrimination policy. In January 2021, Bradley applied for the executive editor position at the Observer-Dispatch. He was informed that he was one of two finalists, but later learned that a new candidate had been chosen. The selected candidate, Sheila Rayam, a Black female, allegedly did not initially express interest or apply for the position and had fewer qualifications than Bradley. The suit claims Gannett did not hire Bradley due to his race and sought a candidate who satisfied their quotas.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: gannett; racism; reverse; rochester

1 posted on 05/01/2023 3:31:15 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines; numberonepal; thinden; Snowybear; Enigo54; Melinda in TN; haffast

This is why a white male, in today’s employment environment, should \never\ agree to (or sign) a “personal improvement program” (PIP) from their employer.
Make them fire you.
Keep the receipts.

I say this from experience with a DJI company that had quotas for both minorities and women in management.
I did not sue...paycheck before personal honor.
Make sure you have HR’s statement of hiring practices and their annual goals for demographic hires.
My company send out a statement that they had a goal of increasing female representation in management to 34% in the year ending 2022.
An increase in one area means a decrease in others.

Oh, and keep in mind, they get to give \themselves\ a raise and bonus according to how well they meet their goals.
This is all discoverable in court.


2 posted on 05/01/2023 3:48:13 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (I keep giving JR money then never get my checkmark. WUWT?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Good! The courts (issue: reverse discrimination) are one front on which this war between good and evil in America must be fought.


3 posted on 05/01/2023 3:49:28 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (Bonhoeffer: “Silence in the face of evil is evil. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Nice...we need to fight back...


4 posted on 05/01/2023 4:11:47 AM PDT by Deplorable American1776 (Guns don't kill people, LIBERALS DO!! Support the Second Amendment...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

I’m so glad I’m retired and don’t have to put up with this BS anymore. P&G is big on this kind of thing and when I retired, they were already having diversity training.


5 posted on 05/01/2023 4:25:23 AM PDT by Melinda in TN (AKA Tennessee Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

It’s not reverse discrimination. It’s just discrimination.


6 posted on 05/01/2023 6:50:15 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down seven times, stand up eight. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
was a direct result of Gannett’s reverse race discrimination policy.

This isn't the 1990s. We need to stop using this archaic phrase. We're well into the frog boil that "reverse" has long lost its meaning.

7 posted on 05/01/2023 7:10:45 AM PDT by LittleBillyInfidel (This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

What is this “ reverse?”

It is discrimination period.


8 posted on 05/01/2023 8:56:54 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson