Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

This is the 113-page brief given to the federal court in Texas:

https://adfmedialegalfiles.blob.core.windows.net/files/AllianceForHippocraticMedicineComplaint.pdf


17 posted on 04/23/2023 8:43:59 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brian Griffin

Excerpts:

First, the FDA never had the authority to approve these drugs for sale. In 2000, the FDA approved chemical abortion drugs under 21 C.F.R. § 314, Subpart H (Subpart H). This regulation authorizes the FDA to grant “accelerated approval” of “certain new drug products that have been studied for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening illnesses and that provide meaningful therapeutic benefit to patients over existing treatments.” 21 C.F.R. § 314.500 (emphasis added).

But chemical abortion drugs do not treat serious or life-threatening illnesses. Indeed, pregnancy is a normal physiological state that many females experience one or more times during their childbearing years.

chemical abortion drugs do not provide a “meaningful therapeutic benefit” to women and girls over existing treatments.

upwards of ten percent (10%) of women who takechemical abortion drugs will need follow-up medical treatment for an incomplete or failed chemical abortion,14 with an average of thirty-nine percent (39%) of women requiring surgery if taken in the second trimester.


19 posted on 04/23/2023 8:52:25 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson