Posted on 04/22/2023 5:30:40 AM PDT by george76
I feel like Paul Revere for patriots. Except I’m shouting, “The elections are being stolen…the elections are being stolen.”
I grew up on the mean streets of New York. I am very familiar with bait and switch. Walking the streets of New York City, I saw three-card-monte conmen setting up shop on sidewalks every day. Their goal was to distract you from picking the right card…and to separate you from your money.
We all just witnessed a bait and switch in the news headlines earlier this week. This is three-card-monte on STEROIDS.
Fox News settled with Dominion over claims of election fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Fox News will now pay Dominion $787 million because Fox News claimed the election was rigged by fraudulent voting machines.
Because Fox News settled with Dominion, now the Marxist-controlled mainstream media will go into full bait-and-switch mode. They will claim “the case is settled and closed. It’s now proven the 2020 election wasn’t rigged and stolen.”
What a scam. What a con. This is the all-time bait and switch.
I may be the TV and radio host most associated with reporting the 2020 election was rigged and stolen. I’ve said it thousands of times on radio and TV. I’ve said it from the day after the 2020 election to today. I’ll never stop saying it. Because it’s true.
The 2020 election was stolen.
And I believe elections are still being rigged and stolen. The 2022 midterms were almost as bad as the 2020 presidential election. One race is Exhibit A. Democrats clearly stole the Arizona Governor’s race from Kari Lake. Arizona Democrats rigged the vote by making sure vote tabulators didn’t work on Election Day in heavily GOP districts.
Democrats are rigging and stealing elections like the Swiss make clocks- with precision. It’s what they do. They rig, cheat and steal.
Yet in all these many years of my reporting and shouting and warning about stolen elections…I’ve never mentioned Dominion, or their voting machines. Because there are so many other simple, easy, low-tech ways Democrats steal elections.
Here is the Democrat playbook for stealing elections…
*No government-issued Voter (or photo) ID.
Did you know we are the only major nation in the world without government issued Voter ID? Did you know all the other nations acknowledge that Voter ID is necessary to prevent widespread voter fraud?
Did you know that Mexico requires government issued Photo ID plus a thumbprint?
Did you know U.S. territory Puerto Rico requires government issued Photo ID plus thumbprint to vote? Yet in America its “racist” (says Democrat frauds) to ask for the same thing required in a U.S. territory.
*Mail-in ballots handed to everyone (in many states mass mailed to voters without even asking), without Voter ID.
Did you know we are the only major nation in the world to allow mail-in ballots? Did you know all the other nations acknowledge publicly that mail-in ballots are a recipe for massive voter fraud?
Did you know even ultra-woke Starbucks demands in-person voting for its own union elections? They told a court that voting by mail leads to voter fraud.
But I’m just getting started. The 2020 election was stolen by…
*Five states colluding to stop the vote count on election night- for the first time in history. They sent all witnesses home, then they magically found enough votes by morning to overcome Trump’s huge leads- with no witnesses in the room.
*Ballot harvesting with no oversight– a practice that until Covid was criminal in 49 states.
*Ballot drop boxes with no oversight. If you don’t understand, please watch the movie “2000 Mules.”
*Little or no signature match on these millions of mail-in ballots.
*Counting fake ballots for days after the election. Ask yourself one simple question: What are the odds only Democrats have won every single time in history, after being behind on Election Night, and then a week of counting ballots? I’m no math genius, but I’d say the odds of that are 1 in a billion.
*Voter Rolls contain millions of inactive or improper registrations.
*Illegal aliens voting by the millions. In many states (like my state Nevada) it’s legal for illegal aliens to get drivers licenses. While at DMV they are automatically registered to vote. You don’t think they’re voting?
*How about $400 million dollars from Zuckerberg- to get out the vote only in deep blue Democrat districts. If Zuckerberg gave $400 million, how much did George Soros give to rig the election?
*How much did China give in illegal contributions to Democrats? We know Democrats took in hundreds of millions in suspicious donations from unemployed Americans. Where do you think that came from?
And the big one…
*We know the FBI rigged the election. They paid Twitter to change the news feed in favor of Biden and silence conservative voices on social media. See emails released by Elon Musk. The FBI rigged the 2020 election. FACT.
So, a FNC settlement with Dominion settles nothing. You and I know the 2020 election was rigged and stolen from a hundred directions.
Don’t fall for the bait and switch.
Problem is, the cat’s out of the bag.
There is no peaceful path to “normality”.
OK - now what?
Excellent summary of the fraud.
I agree with the article. Dominion was not the problem. Unfortunately too many gullible people bought into Rudy Guiliani and Sydney Powell’s fairy tales and made the rest of us look bad. So much so it cost Fox 3/4 of a billion dollars....so far.
I think the settlement between dominion and fox is a fraud and that there is no settlement. I think it was an agreement behind the scenes to destroy any other person such as rudy, lindell, Etc from ever winning a case. I don’t think foxes paying them a dime let alone $787 million
I’m speechless. Five comments and a dead thread?
Guess we know the results of the next election.
For twenty-three and a half long years, I've had the same tagline below. That tagline has been there since Democrats attempted the theft of the Presidential Election of 2000 in Florida.
I've never seen a reason to change my tagline, and if anything it became more and more prescient with each election cycle.
you are EXACTLY correct there is no longer a peaceful path to normality.
If not now, when? If not us (my generation) then WHO?!
If Trump has to prove his innocence, let the Democrat party prove theirs. There will forever be doubts. FNC’s settlement proves nothing.
This is what I think also. No money will change hands, it’s just another everyday media lie. If anything, Dominion may have paid Fox a nominal amount to orchestrate this. I could be wrong, of course, but how do we know?
ping - nice summary
Agenda 2030 cannot be realized if there are - anywhere on earth - free elections. Totalitarian world government could still operate in stealth mode - as long as it has complete control over all worldwide “elections.”
These “lawsuits” will give the msm cover for ignoring any and all derogatory information about electronic voting.
Fox News settled Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation lawsuit against it Tuesday for $787.5 million, avoiding an anticipated six-week trial in the case and bringing two years of litigation to an end—but Dominion and rival company Smartmatic still have numerous other cases pending against right-wing defendants over fraud claims involving the companies’ machines, including a separate pending case against Fox News.
Those numerous other cases involve:
Rudy Giuliani
Sidney Powell
Lou Dobbs
Maria Bartoromo
Mike Lindell
Patrick Byrne (former CEO of Overstock.com)
Newsmax
OANN (One America News Network)
In most cases Dominion and Smartmatic have mirrored lawsuits. Tag team! This is a coordinated attack.
BIG SCAM.
Screw peaceful. That ship has sailed.
That is OK because the list is not supported by Rupert Murdoch. At least one of those on the list will actually hold Dominion’s feet to the fire. Truth IS MORE powerful than lies, eventually.
I think what we witnessed was Deep State money laundering a payment to a computer company fir stealing an election and they did both in plain sight.
I don’t think you’re wrong at all. I think they’re completely and utterly in Cahoots with each other and this is all about destroying any messaging that states there was voter fraud
All of wayne allen roots bullet points will be in play in 2024 plus a couple new ones.
No republican wins national office until the republicans take an interest in how the dems are winning and come up with reply. It grieves me to say this because so far the republicans have shown no interest in winning in the new game the dems haves created.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/washington/29ballot.html
Smartmatic was a little-known firm with no experience in voting technology before it was chosen by the Venezuelan authorities to replace the country’s elections machinery ahead of a contentious referendum that confirmed Mr. Chávez as president in August 2004.
Seven months before that voting contract was awarded, a Venezuelan government financing agency invested more than $200,000 into a smaller technology company, owned by some of the same people as Smartmatic, that joined with Smartmatic as a minor partner in the bid.
In return, the government agency was given a 28 percent stake in the smaller company and a seat on its board, which was occupied by a senior government official who had previously advised Mr. Chávez on elections technology. But Venezuelan officials later insisted that the money was merely a small-business loan and that it was repaid before the referendum.
With a windfall of some $120 million from its first three contracts with Venezuela, Smartmatic then bought the much larger and more established Sequoia Voting Systems, which now has voting equipment installed in 17 states and the District of Columbia.
But the role of the young Venezuelan engineers who founded Smartmatic has become less visible in public documents as the company has been restructured into an elaborate web of offshore companies and foreign trusts.
Since its takeover by Smartmatic in March 2005, Sequoia has worked aggressively to market its voting machines in Latin America and other developing countries. “The goal is to create the world’s leader in electronic voting solutions,” said Mitch Stoller, a company spokesman.
https://www.worldtribune.com/eyewitness-how-hugo-chavez-stole-the-august-2004-election-in-venezuela/ (article November 2020)
One of the first things the regime understood was that it had to completely control the electoral system, but never leave any traces of fraud.”
From 2004 to 2017, the Smartmatic system was used in 14 elections in Venezuela. Machado said the fraudulent activity got more sophisticated as the years went on.
“Indeed, if these criminal systems learn anything, it is not to make the same mistake twice,” Machado said. “With each process, they become more sophisticated and more difficult to detect. Soon after, we realized that there was no single reason that explained all the fraud, but that it was a sum of events and mechanisms. Each one brings a component of the fraud, and together, the result is devastating.”
It almost seems as if Latin America was ground zero for testing methods and procedures for elections using electronic voting, providing the necessary learning curve, and delivering a blueprint for the future.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Venezuelan_recall_referendum
Allegations of electoral fraud
After the preliminary results were broadcast, the opposition Coordinadora Democrática declared that fraud had taken place, stating that its own data (the Penn, Schoen & Berland exit poll, which was performed by volunteers from Sumate, the NGO which had organized the referendum) put the "Yes" vote at 59% and the "No" vote at 40%. Their exit poll showed the opposite result to the official voting data, predicting that Chávez would lose by 20%, whereas the election results showed him to have won by 20%. A poll company representative, Schoen commented, "I think it was a massive fraud".
Election observers insisted that no fraud had taken place, but scholarly analyses published over the years to come disagreed. A statistical study by Maria M. Febres Cordero and Bernardo Márquez was published in 2006 in a peer-reviewed academic statistics journal. The study used cluster analysis to review differences in vote patterns between voting certificates on the basis that voters were randomly assigned to certificates (each voting center had on average 2 or 3 certificates, typically for computerised and manual voting systems). It concluded: "[The] Venezuelan opposition has statistical evidence to reject the official results given by the CNE. The irregularities detected were observed consistently in numerous voting centers and the magnitude of the irregularities imply that the official results do not reflect the intention of voters with statistical confidence." They estimated that 56.4% had voted yes to recall Chavez, as opposed to the official result of 41%.
The presence of systemic election fraud was also supported by six analyses in a special section in the November 2011 issue of Statistical Science. Raquel Prado and Bruno Sansó examined the exit polls; Luis Raul Pericchi and David A Torres examined the no-votes against the Newcomb-Benford law; Isbelia Martin discovered anomalous patterns in telecommunications; Ricardo Hausmann and Roberto I. Rigobón analyzed patterns related to exit polls; Raúl Jiménez examined the distribution of valid votes, null votes, and abstentions in each precinct; while Gustavo Delfino and Guillermo Salas reported on the anomalous relation between signatures requesting the recall, and the yes-votes. The section is introduced by an article written by Alicia L. Carriquiry. One of the papers, by Hausmann and Rigobón, was a later version of a paper disputed by the Carter Center, and contains a response to that criticism.
Some individuals have disputed the center's endorsement of the electoral process in the Venezuelan recall referendum of 2004. Fox News' Doug Schoen told Michael Barone at U.S. News & World Report, "Our internal sourcing tells us that there was fraud in the Venezuelan central commission. There are widespread reports of irregularities and evidence of fraud, many of them ably recorded by Mary Anastasia O'Grady in The Wall Street Journal last week. Carter is untroubled by any of this, and declares that Chavez won 'fair and square.'" The Carter Center looked into the allegations and released a paper and statistical analysis reaffirming their original conclusions.
Sad, but true. And that’s where we are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.