Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/12/2023 7:47:10 AM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Twotone

California has the option to DESALINATE water, which is very cheap compared at least to the retail price of water (desalinated water would add about 10% to a water bill compared to ‘free’ water).

They had a formal application to build a large plant - it was REJECTED by the state due to its relatively minuscule impact on Global Warming. So California, at least, SHOULD take the entire cut.


2 posted on 04/12/2023 7:51:41 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Can anyone explain the inclusion of WYOMING in this statement?

I don’t think the Colorado goes anywhere near Wyoming.


3 posted on 04/12/2023 7:56:04 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
Why does fedgov have the right to cut water allotments in some states but not in others? Is this fair?
Makes me think the ultimate goal is to control EVERYONE's water usage.
As usual, less freedom and more government is the preferred solution.
5 posted on 04/12/2023 8:04:07 AM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
Overuse and a 23-year drought have reduced the river’s flows by one-third

We just had a very rainy winter. This is starting to sound like the USSR complaining about 40 years of bad weather.
6 posted on 04/12/2023 8:04:22 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("If you can’t say something nice . . . say the Rosary." [Red Badger])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

From the fourth paragraph, the most important issue for the Department of the Interior is making sure that Brandon get re-elected. And after all, that should be the prime motive for all of the Federal government’s actions, right?
/s


7 posted on 04/12/2023 8:08:30 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

The government has no respect for established law, compacts, agreements nor treaties. California seems to grab more and more resources while they. have. less and less people.


9 posted on 04/12/2023 8:11:06 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

I actually agree with this. Shut down the golf courses, artificial lakes, and backyard swimming pools for a few years. A very small but very wise sacrifice.


11 posted on 04/12/2023 8:18:19 AM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

The west coast and southwest states use of Colorado River water today is parceled out to them by long term arrangements, that began when the annual flow of the Colorado was much greater. A logn term trend of decreses rainfall along the western side of the Rockies has been lower the Colorado River for decades.

California, Nevada, Arizoan and New Mexico should, in the long run, have their use of the Colordao for drinking water curtailed. But it should be managed together with those states instituting extensive desalinization plant projects, on the California coast and in the Gulf of California (in cooperation with Mexico). Desalinization is the only thing that can manage the southwest states water needs, over the peaks and valleys of available water from the Colorado River. How to power such plants? That would be to use dedicaticated newest-design small modular nuclear power plants, insuring the desalinization plants are not subject to power outtages.


14 posted on 04/12/2023 8:50:42 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

I don’t see how those AZ chip factories are going to get enough water.


18 posted on 04/12/2023 9:06:45 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

Arizona, California, Nevada should never have been given a DROP from that river!!!

And especially NOT California!!!!!!!!!


21 posted on 04/12/2023 9:55:57 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone

https://www.usbr.gov/lc/phoenix/AZ100/1960/background_us_supreme_court_decision.html


23 posted on 04/12/2023 11:44:57 AM PDT by Az Joe (Live free or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson