Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ckilmer

So a squish judge who wanted to fight with “decorum”(just as the RINOs advocate) loses and some how THAT is on Trump too? What am I missing here.


11 posted on 04/09/2023 1:32:25 PM PDT by wiseprince (Me,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: wiseprince

Its not the one thing. Its the many.

For example, do you have any reason to believe that should Trump win massively in 2024—the democrats will not halt the election in key swing states on election night—and truck keep voting until they win?

I believe that Trump will win bigly in 2024. But I see no reason to believe that the dems will not do the same thing again in 2024 should that happen.

2022 should have been a blow out for the pubs. That didn’t happen. Instead, the dems locked in their state control of key swing states like PA,AZ, NV. That means, they control the balloting. That’s key for them.

No chance for the pubs to break that grip.

In wisconsin, the election of the dem chief judge there closes off the chance for any appeal of that election. Dem considered that to paramount. You could see it in the funding. The pub jurist got 15% out of state funding. The dem got 85% of the funding out of state.

Some innovative new tactics were developein in AZ an WI. In WI people could earn $250 by bringing helping people get to the polls. they did it through an app. That will be replicated around the country in 2024. In AZ in maricopa county, dems figured out how to just throw away pub votes. That will be replicated around the country in 2024


120 posted on 04/10/2023 11:23:03 AM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson