Posted on 04/07/2023 9:42:28 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Precisely what they’re pushing for.
Problem is, since this obviously won’t work, if I was Justice Thomas, I’d be very careful as the left will not hesitate to assassinate him if they get an opportunity.
To avoid embarrassment, it helps to read the excerpt. Give it a try.
When/if recusal is appropriate, Thomas would do that without prompting.
Yes, l believe that also. On the other hand we also know rats never recuse. Never
OK...so they’ll probably impeach him. But there’s no way in hell that the Senate will convict. So he’ll just caulk it up to yet another “high tech lynching”.
See Post #86
The major question asked in the above article is why is this being brought up now? Someone in the government passed this information on to Propublica to do a hit piece on Thomas. Because it is not new information. I’m sure the Marshal’s service knew exactly where Thomas was at much as the FBI and CIA would. And, if his security accompanied him, billing was done for their expenses. This is definitely not something a reporter just “discovered”. The info was fed to him.
Even if that was the case, it matters why?
“Even if that was the case, it matters why?”
Because they know that Thomas was staying with friends, not a corporation or organization, or person connected to a case. In those cases it is not necessary to report.
Therefore, this story came out just to try to damage Thomas. Look at the source and its reporting history.
The LA Times reported this story nearly 20 years ago because it was on disclosure reports. After that Thomas stopped disclosing the trips. It is now out there and Thomas hasn’t denied it, just said he’s a dear friend.
“The LA Times reported this story nearly 20 years ago because it was on disclosure reports. After that Thomas stopped disclosing the trips. It is now out there and Thomas hasn’t denied it, just said he’s a dear friend.”
___
The judicial conferences meet periodically (every three years now, I believe), and each time the rules are revised a bit. Reporting requirements may change from one update to another and then back again to the previous requirements. It’s hard to know without looking at each update but that could be the reason for changes in information for each year. I used to have access to previous copies, but I am retired and do not have to worry about that stuff anymore. Yippppeeeee!
LOL I have a dreammmmm!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.