Skip to comments.
Silicon Valley’s Titans Are Realizing a Lot of People Really Don’t Like Them; A bank run led to a wake-up call for America’s most coddled class of plutocrats. (a surprisingly decent read from New Republic)
New Republic ^
| March 14, 2023
| Matt Ford
Posted on 03/14/2023 7:44:25 AM PDT by DoodleBob
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: FLT-bird
Just to be absolutely clear—libertarians are fanatically opposed to censorship—by anybody and of anybody.
Anyone who claims to be “libertarian” that favors any kind of censorship, public or private, is a liar.
21
posted on
03/14/2023 10:56:54 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: DoodleBob
The writer can’t figure out the “woke” issue—it seems to have gone right over their head.
Conclusion—they are not very bright.
22
posted on
03/14/2023 11:00:16 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: DoodleBob
[I suspect Matt Ford wouldn’t enjoy the FReeper Company Barbecue. But his batting average on this article is waaaay better than any utterance from Willard, Yertle, Paul Ryan, or that gasbag Billy Kristol.
I’ll take the win, no matter how ugly.]
The author basically criticizes Silicon Valley for not being woke enough. To the extent a passive aggressive polemic like this gets Silicon Valley rowing in its direction, it’s a win - for the left.
23
posted on
03/14/2023 5:27:37 PM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
To: DoodleBob
Sacks noted in a Unherd interview on Sunday night. “If this was a farmers’ bank and it was 40,000 farms, small business farms that were on the hook, everybody would understand. The arguments being made would be: we can’t let 40,000 farms go out of business. They didn’t do anything wrong. They just trusted when they put their money in a bank that it was safe.”
If that was the case, I guarantee more than 3% of the farms would be within the $250M FDIC cap. It'd be a couple people losing some of their money, not every customer *losing* 99%.
To: ConservativeInPA
Don’t push the payroll crap either. There are multiple ways to mitigate risk of having cash above the FDIC limit of $250k. If these eff’n people focused on business instead of being woke they would know that.
If you pay your employees an average of $100M a year, that's ~$2000 a week or $4000 every two-week pay period. You just have room to pay SIXTY-FIVE employees before you hit the FDIC cap. That's a pretty sizeable company, certainly isn't some tech startup with ten people unless everyone's making a half-million a year or more.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson