Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elon Musk Defends Restricting Military Use of Starlink in Ukraine, Cites Possible Escalation of Conflict
Epoch Times ^ | February 13, 2023 | Katabella Roberts

Posted on 02/13/2023 4:19:25 PM PST by familyop

Musk was responding to former NASA astronaut Scott Kelly, who called on the Tesla CEO on Feb. 11 to “restore the full functionality” of Starlink satellites, adding that Ukraine “desperately needs your continued support.”

“Defense from a genocidal invasion is not an offensive capability. It’s survival. Innocent lives will be lost. You can help. Thank you,” Kelly wrote on Twitter.

However, Musk replied that the Starlink satellite communication network is playing a key role in ensuring communication in Ukraine but should not be used for escalation that could lead to a World War.

“You’re smart enough not to swallow media and other propaganda bs,” Musk responded. “Starlink is the communication backbone of Ukraine, especially at the front lines, where almost all other Internet connectivity has been destroyed. But we will not enable escalation of conflict that may lead to WW3.”

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angryneoconsbelow; antiamerican; bidensneoconbuttboys; neocons4biden; richanarchist; russianagent; traitor; zelenskyworshippers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2023 4:19:25 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: familyop
A voice of sanity.

2 posted on 02/13/2023 4:23:11 PM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Elon does not want to give Russia a reason to take out his Starlink satellites.


3 posted on 02/13/2023 4:25:07 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so stupid people won’t be offended)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei; Krosan; AdmSmith
Ping.

Thought you all and your ping lists might be interested in seeing the article excerpt with this direct quote of the words of Elon Musk.

"'You’re smart enough not to swallow media and other propaganda bs,' Musk responded. 'Starlink is the communication backbone of Ukraine, especially at the front lines, where almost all other Internet connectivity has been destroyed. But we will not enable escalation of conflict that may lead to WW3.'"

4 posted on 02/13/2023 4:26:14 PM PST by familyop ("For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas" (John Webster, "The White Devil" 1612).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

I will just quietly nod since higher powers have put me on super secret double probation.


5 posted on 02/13/2023 4:26:36 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (I am a lesbian trapped in a man's body... gives me more rights. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The problems in Europe should not be our concern now, we have enough of our own.


6 posted on 02/13/2023 4:36:34 PM PST by wjcsux (RIP Rush Limbaugh 12 Jan 1951- 17 Feb 2021. We really miss you. 😢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

BINGO! It duzn’t work now does it you Deep State $h!thd$.


7 posted on 02/13/2023 4:37:49 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Not sure what he means...

The Ruthenians have total internet coverage but don’t have some other kind of coverage to be able to start WWIII...

One might hope, for consistency’s sake, that he will apply the same restrictions to the communists in the WH...


8 posted on 02/13/2023 4:37:49 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperatly need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

No one really knows what this means. If Starlink is as vital to Ukraine’s defense as it’s hyped up to be, we might see Ukraine start to lose ground at a faster pace. My feeling is this announcement may be kayfabe, that nothing has changed. If Starlink is that important, it wouldn’t surprise me if Putin sent contract killers (sicarios or various organized crime hitmen) or illegals* after SpaceX employees. So the announcement might actually be a way to signal to Putin that Starlink has been downgraded to the point it’s barely useful. The Ukrainians would presumably be asked to chime in with complaints so the deception acquires an aura of plausibility.

Seems to me that as a non-defense contractor, Musk’s businesses are very vulnerable to armed attack. So anything that he can do to lower the risk of repercussions to his employees from covert operations mounted on Putin’s orders is a good thing.

* Spetznaz, FSB or other trained shooters without diplomatic cover, guided by deep cover or sympathetic locals, much as the Mossad targeted Nazis and Palestinian terrorists abroad.


9 posted on 02/13/2023 4:44:49 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Somewhere I read where Musk is paying for this out of his own pocket. True?


10 posted on 02/13/2023 4:52:25 PM PST by theoilpainter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus; Paul R.; Bruce Campbells Chin; PIF; familyop; MercyFlush; tet68; BeauBo; TalBlack; ..

Ukraine ping

No one really knows what this means. If Starlink is as vital to Ukraine’s defense as it’s hyped up to be, we might see Ukraine start to lose ground at a faster pace. My feeling is this announcement may be kayfabe, that nothing has changed. If Starlink is that important, it wouldn’t surprise me if Putin sent contract killers (sicarios or various organized crime hitmen) or illegals* after SpaceX employees. So the announcement might actually be a way to signal to Putin that Starlink has been downgraded to the point it’s barely useful. The Ukrainians would presumably be asked to chime in with complaints so the deception acquires an aura of plausibility.

Seems to me that as a non-defense contractor, Musk’s businesses are very vulnerable to armed attack. So anything that he can do to lower the risk of repercussions to his employees from covert operations mounted on Putin’s orders is a good thing.

* Spetznaz, FSB or other trained shooters without diplomatic cover, guided by deep cover or sympathetic locals, much as the Mossad targeted Nazis and Palestinian terrorists abroad.


11 posted on 02/13/2023 4:53:06 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Escalation of the Ukraine conflict is low key the Brandon Administration’s highest foreign policy priority. This of course deliberately poisons, in advance, any acts or initiatives geared toward demonstrating good faith, necessary for eventually achieving a negotiated peace. Musk’s (private sector) intransigence/passivity acts like an antidote to Brandon’s (public sector) poison/aggression. Brandon will probably brutally attack Musk to try to force his hand, and Musk, in turn, will probably refuse to play ball.


12 posted on 02/13/2023 4:54:20 PM PST by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
Seems to me that as a non-defense contractor, Musk’s businesses are very vulnerable to armed attack.

Musk also understands that his Starlink satellites are not hardened against attack by Russian anti-satellite weapons.

13 posted on 02/13/2023 5:10:31 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (The rot of all principle begins with a single compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Well, as cheaply as Musk can put Starlink satellites up, compared to Russia’s being able to take them down in large numbers, Musk probably doesn’t have too much to worry about.

But really though, Musk can position SpaceX as “neutral but humanitarian”, as it’s pretty certain the Ukies get help with secure military comms from NATO.

The WW3 stuff in this instance is just some BS.


14 posted on 02/13/2023 5:26:21 PM PST by Paul R. (You know your pullets are dumb if they don't recognize a half Whopper as food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The Uke droans dropping hydrogen cyanide boms operated on Starlink. When Musk found out, that was it.


15 posted on 02/13/2023 5:26:59 PM PST by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor; marcusmaximus; Paul R.; Bruce Campbells Chin; PIF; familyop; MercyFlush; tet68; ...

Ukraine ping

SauronofMordor: [Musk also understands that his Starlink satellites are not hardened against attack by Russian anti-satellite weapons.]


AFAIK, the satellites are hundreds of miles apart. There are thousands of them. Each satellite is said to cost less than $1m, including launch costs. The ballistic missiles to target each satellite would cost millions apiece. In theory, it would cost the Russians more to shoot them down than for Musk to send them up. Assuming Uncle Sam backstops Musk’s replacement costs, it’s hard to see how the Russians would keep up.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2022/02/14/starlink-hits-250000-customers-elon-musk-hints-spacex-booking-over-300-millionyear/?sh=49aaf8e77063


16 posted on 02/13/2023 5:31:55 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Spacex launchs new starlink sats at least once or twice a months all in different orbits in the 325 mile high. Last year the ukies ask musk to send them the receivers so they had internet again. Cost spacex 100 million yr for this service, uncle sugar is not backing up spacex for the service.


17 posted on 02/13/2023 6:17:13 PM PST by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Starlink is simply stopping signals in general near the front lines and/or Internet video streaming from the drones. The drones already have separate controllers. Our Army has been training and providing Ukrainian soldiers with alternative communications since Musk’s last tantrum.


18 posted on 02/13/2023 6:17:26 PM PST by familyop ("For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas" (John Webster, "The White Devil" 1612).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Wait, I thought the Libs told us that tech companies were allowed to create whatever rules they want?!


19 posted on 02/13/2023 6:23:07 PM PST by Kenny Bania (Ovaltine? Why not call it Roundtine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.
"Well, as cheaply as Musk can put Starlink satellites up, compared to Russia’s being able to take them down in large numbers, Musk probably doesn’t have too much to worry about.

But really though, Musk can position SpaceX as “neutral but humanitarian”, as it’s pretty certain the Ukies get help with secure military comms from NATO.

The WW3 stuff in this instance is just some BS.
"

Very well said. Musk has only managed to divide his clientele and investors and will be losing many of them soon enough. He should say no to drugs and leave South African politics behind.

20 posted on 02/13/2023 6:28:34 PM PST by familyop ("For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas" (John Webster, "The White Devil" 1612).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson