I still don’t see your point. Already mentioned DMV as a prime area for AI to develop. In fact, it’s already in work in several states in their RFPs for development contracts.
The premise is that efficiencies created by AI systems will allow state workforce ranks to be reduced through attrition, thus allowing for state budgets to shrink.
It appears you’re trying your best to find an argument without basis. ChatGPT is not and will not be a government AI platform. It is a headline designed to be sensational to drive views, nothing more.
I guess you don't. Because our recent conversations have had nothing to do with ChatGPT. I've been focusing on refuting your claim that AI will be a benefit to government. So why are YOU bringing up ChatCPT here?
It appears you’re trying your best to find an argument without basis. ChatGPT is not and will not be a government AI platform.
(All I originally did upthread was draw a valid comparison between ChatGPT and AI. But after that I made no more remarks concerning ChatGPT. Right?)